UK candidates are ‘uncomfortable’ with AI-led recruitment processes

-

The data, published by recruitment firm Gi Group UK as part of the The 2025 Candidate Survey, shows growing concerns among candidates about the rise of automation in hiring.

Among those aged 55 to 64, 33.78 percent reported feeling “very uncomfortable” with AI tools in recruitment. Only a small proportion of younger candidates were confident about automation, with just 19.88 percent of 18 to 25 year olds and 7.19 percent of 35 to 54 year olds saying they were “very comfortable”.

In the context of automated CV screening, chatbots and AI-driven assessments, the findings suggest that a significant number of applicants prefer traditional human interaction. Gi Group is urging employers to proceed with caution when integrating AI into recruitment and to ensure candidates receive adequate support throughout the hiring process.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Human interaction remains central to candidate experience

Rebecca Napier, IT Business Partner at Gi Group UK, said the findings reflect a need to maintain authenticity in candidate communication.

“AI is here, and it is here to stay. There is no denying that AI systems have their uses and should certainly be integrated to increase business efficiency, however, the recruitment process needs to remain adaptable.

“Our candidate survey has found that an important proportion of our candidates feel very uncomfortable when approached by Chatbots rather than people. Maintaining authenticity for candidates is an integral element of our role which is why AI should be implemented with caution, especially when it is being used externally.”

Napier added that while AI can offer significant operational benefits across industries, it cannot fully replace the reassurance of personal contact. “Ensuring there is someone at the end of the phone to ease concerns is key,” she said.

Balancing automation and candidate support

Recruiters are increasingly adopting AI to automate stages of the hiring process, using tools such as chatbots to streamline application workflows, reduce bias and generate data insights. However, the Gi Group survey suggests that jobseekers may not be fully comfortable with such changes, particularly when there is limited human involvement.

Commenting on the operational pressure recruiters are facing, Napier said, “AI extensions have hit the recruitment industry from all angles and while data shows candidates value human interactions, the industry has been inundated with CVs that lack appropriate qualifications and role awareness,” Napier said. “With this increase in mind, recruiters are left in a challenging position as they navigate the ever-changing recruitment landscape.

“It’s important that we continue to find new and improved ways to increase productivity and reduce time wasted on admin. However, ensuring we are providing the right support to candidates is vital. We must ask ourselves why candidates are uncomfortable with Chatbot interactions and focus on how we can simultaneously provide the right service but also the most effective for each individual.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues.

Latest news

Kevin Chan: Escaping the artificial AI talent crisis

The application of AI to traditional business processes has led to a massive shake-up of the employment market.

University no longer pays for everyone as employers back apprenticeships

Lifetime returns from higher education are becoming more uneven as employers place growing value on vocational routes into work.

CIPD Insight: October’s employment law reforms demand action now

October will bring new trade union access rights, tougher anti-harassment duties and fresh obligations for employers. Here’s how HR can prepare now.

Employers plan smaller pay rises for 2027 despite inflation uncertainty

Early forecasts suggest organisations are becoming more cautious on reward budgets as cost pressures persist and economic conditions remain uncertain.
- Advertisement -

Employees opting for home working ‘to escape noisy offices’

More employees are choosing to work from home to avoid noisy workplaces, with many saying office distractions are affecting concentration.

The org chart isn’t dying. It’s being demoted.

AI is changing how companies organise work, raising questions about middle managers, accountability and workplace governance.

Must read

Derek Irvine: 5 Common HR myths

It’s no surprise that business success relies heavily on an engaged and motivated workforce. The problem is that, while social recognition is increasingly regarded as an effective way of achieving this, there is a wealth of misinformation about how businesses should implement recognition practices. These myths not only have the ability to thwart a company’s effort to build a unified corporate culture, but it can end up impacting a company’s productivity level, and subsequently, bottom line. Here are some of the most common HR myths, and how these can be overcome:

Naysan Firoozmand: If a happy worker is a productive worker, how happy are yours?

You’re probably familiar with a children’s song, If You’re...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you