Nearly two out of three ‘would trust AI to inform important work decisions’

-

A recent poll by the CIPD has found that almost two thirds of people (63%) would trust artificial intelligence (AI) to inform, but not make, important work decisions.

The survey of over 2,000 people showed that 35 percent would prefer human intelligence for such decisions, while just 1 percent would trust AI to make them outright.

The findings come as the UK Government launches the AI Opportunities Action Plan, aimed at accelerating AI adoption in public services and driving economic growth. While CIPD supports the increased use of AI, it says there is the need for a human-centred approach to mitigate risks and ensure ethical implementation.

Clear Guidelines

Hayfa Mohdzaini, senior policy and practice adviser for technology at the CIPD, said, “There’s no question that AI is transforming jobs, careers and workplaces at a rapid pace. By fostering a culture of experimentation and shared learning, organisations can help employees to develop their skills and become more comfortable using new technologies.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The professional body for HR and people development is calling on employers and HR teams to establish clear guidelines on AI use in the workplace. These should address ethical considerations, data security, and fair treatment of employees.

“We’ve seen that AI can be used effectively to support decision-making and simplify processes, thereby freeing up time to do other things,” Mohdzaini added. “But as our findings suggest, human oversight is still very important and there’s a careful balance to be struck. When used alongside human judgement, and in a responsible and ethical way, AI can enhance jobs and increase productivity.”

Business leaders and HR professionals responding to the poll acknowledged AI’s potential benefits but highlighted the need for human oversight in decisions that affect people. Some suggested that trust in AI should be built gradually, depending on the nature of the decision being made.

“Organisations have a responsibility to have clear guidelines in place and train people on AI as needed, to ensure that no one gets left behind,” Mohdzaini  concluded. “It’s also essential for employers to monitor how technology is being used in their organisations and to help employees to understand the risks involved.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Deborah Lewis: It says “welcome”

Many software companies now sell onboarding solutions to increase...

Mark Loftus: Why it’s time to disrupt talent management

Two decades on from McKinsey coining the phrase "war for talent", do alternatives exist?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you