Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

-

The warning from the HR body comes in response to the government’s latest proposals on union access, which form part of a wider effort to reshape workplace rights and engagement between employers and trade unions.

The concerns centre on how quickly employers would be required to grant access and how frequently unions could enter workplaces under the proposed framework.

Timing and operational impact

Ben Willmott, head of public policy at the CIPD, said the organisation welcomed some flexibility in the proposals but warned that key elements could prove difficult for employers to manage.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“It is encouraging the government has listened and provided more time for employers to respond to a trade union’s request for access and to negotiate the terms of an access agreement,” he said in a statement provided to HRreview.

But he said the proposed timelines remained too tight for many organisations, particularly those without established union relationships.

“However it’s disappointing that the government has decided to push ahead and require that there will be a minimum of just five working days between the agreement of initial access terms and when union access to the workplace takes place for the first time.

“For an employer not used to working with a trade union, more time will typically be needed to make arrangements to allow access.”

He also raised concerns about the frequency and notice requirements for access.

“Similarly, it is concerning that the government is proceeding with plans to require employers to provide weekly access to trade unions, and to allow unions to provide a minimum of just two working days’ notice to employers before they access the workplace despite the strong feedback in the consultation against these approaches,” he said.

‘One-size’ approach risks burdening employers

Willmott said the proposals could place disproportionate strain on certain organisations, particularly smaller businesses or those with limited HR capacity.

“CIPD members have told us these requirements fail to consider the time and pressure that businesses are facing and will place a disproportionate burden on many employers, particularly SMEs, businesses with limited resources and those facing severe operational demands,” he said.

He added that a uniform approach to access might not support the government’s wider aims. “The CIPD believes such a ‘one-size fits all’ approach is not appropriate and won’t support the positive employment relations climate the government is seeking to promote,” he said.

Government seeks views on new access framework

The proposals form part of a draft code of practice published by the Department for Business and Trade, which is consulting on how trade unions and employers should negotiate and manage access to workplaces.

The code is intended to provide practical guidance on how requests should be made, how agreements should be implemented and what best practice looks like across different types of organisations.

The consultation, which applies across England, Scotland and Wales, is open until 20 May and is seeking input from employers, unions and other stakeholders.

The debate reflects a wider tension between strengthening worker representation and ensuring organisations have the capacity to respond effectively. Experts say the proposals raise questions for employers about how to manage access requests, maintain operations and ensure that engagement with unions is constructive rather than disruptive.

The final shape of the code will determine how these competing priorities are balanced, and whether the changes lead to improved workplace dialogue or increased friction between employers and unions.

Managing Editor at Black | Website

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Martin Johnson: Why the Employment Rights Act marks the end of informal management

It’s crucial that organisations quickly realise the Employment Rights Act isn’t solely a legal change. In effect, it marks the end of informal management.

Unpaid wage claims ‘hit eight-year high’ as business failures rise

Rising insolvencies are leaving growing numbers of workers unpaid as HR teams face mounting legal risks around rushed redundancies and delayed wages.

Employers urged to rethink race for chief AI officers

Companies are being warned against rushing to appoint chief AI officers before establishing the systems and leadership structures needed to support them.

Building workforce skills for AI performance

AI is changing the way work gets done—but most organisations still lack a clear plan for building AI-ready teams.
- Advertisement -

UK risks ‘lost generation’ as youth unemployment crisis deepens

A major review warns that Britain could face a “lost generation” as youth unemployment and economic inactivity continue rising.

‘Delighted to be wrong about jobs apocalypse’, says OpenAI boss Altman

The OpenAI chief executive said human interaction remained far harder to replace than many technology leaders first predicted.

Must read

Gail Cohen: Making the most of gift cards as an employee reward

The gift card market has grown by more than 20 per cent.

Sue Husband: Five reasons to take on a trainee

Traineeships provide 16 – 24-year-olds with the essential work...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you