Less than two-thirds of employers ‘very confident’ their pension scheme complies with regulations

-

That’s according to research from Towergate Employee Benefits. Automatic enrolment, introduced over a decade ago, requires employers to provide a workplace pension, enrol eligible staff automatically and contribute to their pension pots.

Although the concept is widely known, a number of employers still appear unclear on the practical requirements. Changes in personnel or internal processes may have left gaps in expertise or oversight, particularly where AE responsibilities have shifted departments.

Sorangi Shah, client director at Towergate Employee Benefits, said, “Auto-enrolment is designed to make it easy for employees to benefit from a pension, but employers need to fully understand the regulations and know who is eligible and how much to contribute, otherwise they may be at risk of non-compliance.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has the authority to issue compliance notices and impose fines for breaches. Employers are expected to manage the entire process, including calculating contributions, setting up payroll integration and communicating with staff. A failure in any of these areas may result in penalties or missed obligations.

Knowledge gaps in compliance processes

AE regulations require more than initial enrolment. Employers must also declare their compliance with TPR and maintain ongoing duties such as informing employees of any changes in age or earnings that affect their eligibility. Every three years, they are also required to re-enrol staff who have opted out or are contributing below the minimum threshold.

Categories such as eligible, entitled and non-eligible employees can change over time, depending on employment status and salary levels. This complexity may contribute to why many employers fall short of feeling fully confident in their scheme’s compliance. Shah noted that employers are often unaware of how these categories work and what is required for each group.

When Towergate’s pension specialists conduct scheme health-checks, they regularly find missing or incomplete statutory communications. These communications are essential in notifying employees of their enrolment rights and opt-out options. Confusion between probation periods and statutory postponement rules are frequent occurrences, as are misunderstandings around opt-in rights during the postponement window.

Common errors found in workplace pension schemes

Towergate’s assessments often reveal errors in completing pension certificates, particularly among employers who do not use qualifying earnings as the basis for calculating contributions. For these employers, certificates are mandatory and serve to confirm compliance when using alternative methods.

Re-enrolment procedures also appear to be a weak spot. Shah explained that many employers either neglect to complete re-enrolment entirely or do so incorrectly, potentially leading to a breach of legal requirements. This part of AE, while routine, can easily be missed or mishandled without proper oversight.

Shah added, “With little over half of employers feeling very confident that they are fully compliant with the auto-enrolment regulations, it is important to take advice from a pension professional and consider having a pension health-check.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Are high salaries enough for the best talent?

It's becoming more and more common to hear the words "marketing" and "employer brand" being thrown around HR and recruitment teams. Against a tough economic backdrop employers have looked long and hard at their cost base with many workforces being trimmed to the minimum. If most FD's had their way employers would be left with a very few, incredibly talented and equally overworked employees!

David Bird: How will the changing role of pensions affect the way employers deliver them to employees?

Since the launch of auto enrollment in the UK, employers are faced with the issue of making their scheme stand out whilst also ensuring that the necessary legal and regulatory requirements are being met. There are a few specific actionable areas that can really add value to your employees.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you