HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Less than two-thirds of employers ‘very confident’ their pension scheme complies with regulations

-

That’s according to research from Towergate Employee Benefits. Automatic enrolment, introduced over a decade ago, requires employers to provide a workplace pension, enrol eligible staff automatically and contribute to their pension pots.

Although the concept is widely known, a number of employers still appear unclear on the practical requirements. Changes in personnel or internal processes may have left gaps in expertise or oversight, particularly where AE responsibilities have shifted departments.

Sorangi Shah, client director at Towergate Employee Benefits, said, “Auto-enrolment is designed to make it easy for employees to benefit from a pension, but employers need to fully understand the regulations and know who is eligible and how much to contribute, otherwise they may be at risk of non-compliance.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has the authority to issue compliance notices and impose fines for breaches. Employers are expected to manage the entire process, including calculating contributions, setting up payroll integration and communicating with staff. A failure in any of these areas may result in penalties or missed obligations.

Knowledge gaps in compliance processes

AE regulations require more than initial enrolment. Employers must also declare their compliance with TPR and maintain ongoing duties such as informing employees of any changes in age or earnings that affect their eligibility. Every three years, they are also required to re-enrol staff who have opted out or are contributing below the minimum threshold.

Categories such as eligible, entitled and non-eligible employees can change over time, depending on employment status and salary levels. This complexity may contribute to why many employers fall short of feeling fully confident in their scheme’s compliance. Shah noted that employers are often unaware of how these categories work and what is required for each group.

When Towergate’s pension specialists conduct scheme health-checks, they regularly find missing or incomplete statutory communications. These communications are essential in notifying employees of their enrolment rights and opt-out options. Confusion between probation periods and statutory postponement rules are frequent occurrences, as are misunderstandings around opt-in rights during the postponement window.

Common errors found in workplace pension schemes

Towergate’s assessments often reveal errors in completing pension certificates, particularly among employers who do not use qualifying earnings as the basis for calculating contributions. For these employers, certificates are mandatory and serve to confirm compliance when using alternative methods.

Re-enrolment procedures also appear to be a weak spot. Shah explained that many employers either neglect to complete re-enrolment entirely or do so incorrectly, potentially leading to a breach of legal requirements. This part of AE, while routine, can easily be missed or mishandled without proper oversight.

Shah added, “With little over half of employers feeling very confident that they are fully compliant with the auto-enrolment regulations, it is important to take advice from a pension professional and consider having a pension health-check.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Ian Butterworth: Recruiters, are you missing a trick with social media?

There are now over 2.206 billion people actively using social media, with the figure rising 176 million in the last year. But despite people’s obvious love for this digital form of communication, many recruiters are still failing to utilise it effectively.

Ian Davidson: London calling

Introduction I was listening to a radio program about the...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you