Less than two-thirds of employers ‘very confident’ their pension scheme complies with regulations

-

That’s according to research from Towergate Employee Benefits. Automatic enrolment, introduced over a decade ago, requires employers to provide a workplace pension, enrol eligible staff automatically and contribute to their pension pots.

Although the concept is widely known, a number of employers still appear unclear on the practical requirements. Changes in personnel or internal processes may have left gaps in expertise or oversight, particularly where AE responsibilities have shifted departments.

Sorangi Shah, client director at Towergate Employee Benefits, said, “Auto-enrolment is designed to make it easy for employees to benefit from a pension, but employers need to fully understand the regulations and know who is eligible and how much to contribute, otherwise they may be at risk of non-compliance.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has the authority to issue compliance notices and impose fines for breaches. Employers are expected to manage the entire process, including calculating contributions, setting up payroll integration and communicating with staff. A failure in any of these areas may result in penalties or missed obligations.

Knowledge gaps in compliance processes

AE regulations require more than initial enrolment. Employers must also declare their compliance with TPR and maintain ongoing duties such as informing employees of any changes in age or earnings that affect their eligibility. Every three years, they are also required to re-enrol staff who have opted out or are contributing below the minimum threshold.

Categories such as eligible, entitled and non-eligible employees can change over time, depending on employment status and salary levels. This complexity may contribute to why many employers fall short of feeling fully confident in their scheme’s compliance. Shah noted that employers are often unaware of how these categories work and what is required for each group.

When Towergate’s pension specialists conduct scheme health-checks, they regularly find missing or incomplete statutory communications. These communications are essential in notifying employees of their enrolment rights and opt-out options. Confusion between probation periods and statutory postponement rules are frequent occurrences, as are misunderstandings around opt-in rights during the postponement window.

Common errors found in workplace pension schemes

Towergate’s assessments often reveal errors in completing pension certificates, particularly among employers who do not use qualifying earnings as the basis for calculating contributions. For these employers, certificates are mandatory and serve to confirm compliance when using alternative methods.

Re-enrolment procedures also appear to be a weak spot. Shah explained that many employers either neglect to complete re-enrolment entirely or do so incorrectly, potentially leading to a breach of legal requirements. This part of AE, while routine, can easily be missed or mishandled without proper oversight.

Shah added, “With little over half of employers feeling very confident that they are fully compliant with the auto-enrolment regulations, it is important to take advice from a pension professional and consider having a pension health-check.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Why mental health matters

In the build up to January’s Absence & Attendance...

Zahra Mahmood: Sexual harassment claims and NDAs in the era of Me Too

"In this new post #MeToo era, it has never been more important to give serious attention to such matters when raised."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you