HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Leading economists ‘rebuff anti-growth claims on Employment Rights Bill’

-

A group of ten economists and labour lawyers has rejected claims by business leaders that the proposed Employment Rights Bill will harm economic growth.

The signatories – including Ozlem Onaran, professor of economics at the University of Greenwich and Jonathan Michie, professor of innovation and knowledge exchange at the University of Cambridge – argue that stronger worker protections can enhance productivity and create economic stability.

In an open letter published on the Institute for Employment Rights (IER) website, the group disputes assertions made by business organisations such as the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) that the Bill would create excessive regulation and hinder job creation. Instead, they state that “labour laws do not, on the whole, have negative economic consequences and may well have positive ones”.

The letter argues that employment protection laws improve job security, encourage investment in worker training and capital improvements and ultimately boost productivity.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Professor Onaran commented, “Britain was a pioneer in labour legislation and history shows that stronger employment rights contribute to economic stability rather than hinder it. The notion that protecting workers harms growth is not supported by serious economic research.”

Impact of Employment Rights Bill on Businesses and Wages

Some business groups have expressed concern over measures in the Bill, including the introduction of day-one rights against unfair dismissal, a ban on zero-hours contracts (including for agency workers) and changes to Statutory Sick Pay. The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has argued that the Bill could “wreak havoc” on an already fragile economy. However, the economists and labour lawyers dismiss these claims, stating that SMEs benefit from effective labour law enforcement, which prevents unfair competition through undercutting.

The group also highlights the economic benefits of strengthened collective bargaining rights, arguing that higher wages contribute to greater consumer spending and a stronger tax base.

“Labour laws promoting collective bargaining tend to raise wages and stabilise employment,” Professor Onaran added. “Higher wages increase demand for locally produced goods and services, which directly benefits businesses.”

The letter further challenges the argument that labour protections deter private investment, asserting that well-designed employment laws can complement improvements to public infrastructure and economic growth. The signatories argue that, over time, the economic benefits of fair labour laws outweigh their costs, as they lead to a more stable and productive workforce.

Calls for Stronger Worker Protections

While acknowledging that the Bill represents progress, the group argues that it does not go far enough in addressing exploitative employment practices. The IER, a think tank supported by trade unions and law firms, calls for further measures to strengthen enforcement and close legal loopholes that allow poor working conditions to persist.

Lord John Hendy KC, chairperson of the IER and a signatory of the letter, spoke of the need for a comprehensive approach to employment rights.

“Stronger employment protections are not an obstacle to economic growth but a driver of stability, productivity and fairness,” he said. “This Bill is an important first step in addressing the failures of deregulation, but it does not go far enough. Without decisive action to close loopholes, strengthen enforcement and deliver the protections workers need, the UK will remain out of step with European and international labour standards.”

He added that this is a “once in a generation moment” to rebalance the power relationship between workers and employers in the UK.

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Alex Fleming: Remove stigma from hybrid working in 2022

Is flexible working the great equaliser, asks Alex Fleming? She warns there is a danger for people who choose to work from home when the office is open, to miss out on social capital, when compared to their in-office counterparts - but says it shouldn’t be this way.

Kristie Willis: Discrimination in recruitment

The recent successful claim by a Jewish woman, Aurelie Fhima, for indirect discrimination following the refusal of her application for employment has brought discrimination against job applicants into the spotlight.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you