As of last Friday new government legislation came into force requiring companies with a turnover of £36 million or more to produce a ‘slavery and human trafficking statement’ at the end of each financial year.

The rules will apply to businesses with a year end of 31 March 2016 or later and the statement should be published as soon as possible (and in practice within six months) after the year end.  The statement must then be published on the organisation’s website with a link “displayed in a prominent place” on its homepage.

Slavery under the new rules is a concept that covers servitude and forced or compulsory labour, which may be difficult to distinguish from exploitative working practices more generally. Generally, work exacted from a person under the menace of some penalty, for which they have not offered themselves voluntarily, will be indicative of slavery.

What guidance is available?

The statement has to tick a certain amount of boxes in order to pass muster with authorities. It must, for example, state the steps the organisation has taken during the financial year to ensure that slavery and human trafficking does not play a role in any of its supply chains or in any part of its business, for example, within its foreign subsidiaries. An organisation can be compelled by court order to produce a statement, so companies are warned against being overly tardy.

The new rules give non-compulsory examples of what a statement may contain information on, such as the organisation’s structure, business and supply chains, as well as:

  • the company’s policies in relation to slavery and human trafficking
  • the due diligence undertaken across its business and supply chains in relation to slavery and human trafficking
  • the parts of the company’s business and supply chains where there is risk of modern slavery taking place and what steps have been taken to assess and manage that risk
  • the effectiveness of the steps the organisation has taken, measured against performance indicators it considers appropriate
  • the training on modern slavery available to staff

The government has released guidance on the preparation of a statement in order to help companies with its production. suggesting amongst other things that an organisation disclose information on  the sector the business operates in and whether any of its work is seasonal, as well as the countries it sources its goods or services from, including high risk countries where modern forms of slavery are prevalent. The government also advices that company’s mention the make-up and complexity of its supply chains and relationships with suppliers and others, including trade unions and other bodies representing workers and what minimum labour standards it expects from suppliers and how they align with industry standards.

A business may also want to mention its Supplier Code of Conduct, if it has one and the consequences for suppliers found to contravene the Code of Conduct. Any risk assessments created for specific nations, sectors and  key performance indicators (KPIs) for Sourcing Directors which discourage pressuring suppliers into relying on slave labour, should also be noted.

Should organisations follow the guidance?

The guidance is not compulsory and there is no legal penalty for non-compliance. However, it is clear that the government expects consumers, investors and NGOs to engage and even apply pressure where they believe the business has not taken sufficient steps. Public scrutiny will therefore provide the primary incentive for producing detailed and transparent statements.

Similar rules are in place in California where the NGO ‘KnowTheChain’ has already engaged in public shaming exercises. The London and New York-based Business and Human Rights Resource Centre has also been active in approaching non-compliant organisations under the Californian regime and is very likely to turn its attention to businesses who fail to comply with the spirit, as well as the letter of reporting requirements under the new UK rules.

What companies should do next

Organisations subject to the reporting requirement will need to ensure their slavery and human trafficking statement is underpinned by appropriate and proportionate action that is defensible in the face of scrutiny and criticism from inside and outside of the organisation (e.g. from trade unions and whistleblowers with intimate knowledge of an organisation’s approach to modern slavery on the ground). Those that already produce voluntary disclosures under the UN Guiding Principles Reporting Framework, and those quoted companies which are required to report on certain human rights, social and community issues, will likely already have material which is useful for a slavery and human trafficking statement.

There will undoubtedly be significant differences in the approaches organisations take to supply chain due diligence, management and the reporting requirement given risk profiles will vary. Procurement policies addressing modern slavery, contractual protections in supply contracts, clear labour and whistleblowing policies and consistent messaging throughout the supply chain will be important wherever organisations are operating. However, for those organisations operating in high risk jurisdictions, enhanced due diligence and the implementation of more stringent preventative measures will undoubtedly be required.

Chris Holme is Employment Partner at international law firm Clyde & Co. Holme partners with employers to manage all the issues they face from planning for re-organisations and outsourcings, through to managing high-value discrimination and whistle-blowing disputes in the employment tribunals.  He also deals with issues around the protection of business interests, including dealing with confidentiality, restrictive covenants, and team move issues. He also regularly deals with regulatory and data protection issues.





 | Website

Robert joined the HRreview editorial team in October 2015. After graduating from the University of Salford in 2009 with a BA in Politics, Robert has spent several years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past he has been part of editorial teams at Flux Magazine, Mondo*Arc Magazine and The Marine Professional.