What should you do if an employee discloses a debilitating disability after you hire them?

-

Picture this: You have finally filled a vacancy and are excited to be welcoming the successful candidate to your team. But on their first day, they say that they need to take every Monday off for the foreseeable future for medical appointments. Not only that, they need to work two days a week from home.

You are confused. This is the first you’ve heard of it. You advertised a full-time, in-office role. This was discussed during the interview process, and you never came up against any resistance. What now?

Andrew Willis, Head of Legal at Croner, says:

“This is a tricky situation that employers will hope they don’t find themselves in. But the reality is that sometimes, the needs of both employer and employee just don’t align – and there won’t always be a workable solution. 

“Candidates have no obligation to disclose a disability at any point during the application or interview process. And it’s wise for employers to avoid any questions about their medical history to prevent any potential claims of discrimination. The Equality Act 2010 stipulates that employers can’t reject someone just because they’re disabled: rather if the employee can’t complete the role due to disability, employers may have to at least consider reasonable adjustments or reject them based on other grounds not related to a protected disability.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“If it becomes apparent that a newly recruited employee is not capable of completing essential tasks due to a disability, employers need to consider their position carefully. There are no minimum service requirements for employees to be able to raise a discrimination claim to the tribunal. 

“The Equality Act 2010 requires employers to consider whether there are appropriate measures or supports (known as reasonable adjustments) they could implement that would allow the person to carry out the duties required of them.

“What measures would be considered ‘reasonable’ is assessed on a case-by-case basis, looking at factors such as what funding is available to the employer as well as the size and financial resources of the company. Reasonable adjustments could include shorter working days, remote or flexible working, physical changes to the workspace, etc.

“If there are no reasonable alternatives that would enable the employee to continue working, the employer should follow fair procedures and seek to terminate the contract of employment on capability grounds.  

“If you explore all reasonable accommodations that could allow your new hire to take up the role and it’s just not feasible to make changes to either the role or the workplace, the risk of the employee making a successful discrimination claim on the grounds of disability should be reduced. Even if you take this step however and follow fair procedures before confirming a dismissal, there is no guarantee of successfully defending a discrimination claim. These claims are examined on a case-by-case basis and ultimately it is very difficult to guarantee that a tribunal will accept your defence.

“The best course of action is to always make clear the working arrangements for any role during the recruitment process. Communicate the businesses’ requirements right from the off, whether that’s the need for employees to work in-office all the time, how many days per week, whether the hours are flexible or not, etc., and seek agreement. Have open discourse on how the employer can support the candidate should reasonable adjustments be required, and then there should be no surprises when new starters join your team with varying requirements.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Katherine Conway: How can we beat unconscious gender bias in the workplace?

It’s easy to assume that the business case for gender parity has been won. Innumerable studies have shown the benefits of greater gender equality in the workplace and of introducing more women to leadership positions. One recent study estimated that gender parity could add $12 trillion to the global economy, while others have found that companies with women on their boards outperform those with all-male boards, leading to an opportunity cost of $655 billion a year in the U.S., U.K. and India alone.

Simon Reichwald: Getting ghosted by talent?

Whether it is reneges, declines or ghosting - businesses now need to work harder than ever to deliver a hiring experience like no other if they want to maximise and retain their incoming talent.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you