Most job applications ‘ignored’ as AI use for CVs and cover letters rises

-

A recent survey by global talent solutions firm Robert Walters also found that more than half of jobseekers (54%) are now using artificial intelligence (AI) to support their applications. A further 45 percent say they rely on AI or automation tools to streamline their search, with 19 percent stating they use them regularly.

The survey also found that lengthy application processes are a deterrent, with 58 percent of candidates unwilling to apply for roles that require extensive steps.

Hiring managers are also feeling the impact. Seventy percent report an increase in application volume, with 57 percent admitting that this has led to delays in responding to candidates. Despite advances in applicant tracking systems (ATS), the volume of submissions has led to some suitable candidates being overlooked.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

AI-created CVs: the response from employers

The use of AI in CVs and cover letters is noticeable to many employers. According to the survey, 73 percent of hiring managers say they can identify when a candidate has used AI, citing impersonal language and overly polished formatting as key indicators. Of these, 35 percent believe that the use of AI has a negative effect on their perception of the applicant.

Chris Eldridge, CEO of Robert Walters UK&I, said, that despite AI’s usefulness for quick applications, authenticity is what hiring managers truly value.

“Many professionals believe tailoring their CV with AI improves their chances, but employers can often spot the language or overly polished formatting, which can actually work against them,” he said.

The main reason for rejecting applications remains a lack of relevant experience, named by 62 percent of hiring managers. Despite this, many still review applications manually, which can limit their ability to identify the strongest candidates when faced with high volumes.

High-volume applications and candidate disengagement

The survey found that 29 percent of jobseekers apply for more than 20 roles per week. This mass outreach approach often results in poorly tailored applications, with some candidates failing to address key requirements. There is also a growing trend of candidates withdrawing from the hiring process without notice, commonly known as ‘ghosting’.

According to the Robert Walters hiring challenges report, this has increased alongside the rise in AI usage.

Chris added, “To improve candidate engagement and reduce ghosting, organisations should focus on creating a positive and transparent interview experience. This involves maintaining open communication throughout the process, providing timely feedback and addressing any candidate concerns promptly.”

He added that showcasing workplace culture, values and opportunities for progression will help attract committed professionals.

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Case Study: Cadbury Schweppes Flexible Benefits Package

In an exclusive article Sue Laverick, UK Employee Benefits Manager, Cadbury Schweppes, discusses the benefits of her organisation's flex scheme.

Katy Meves and Nick Jupp: What can all employers learn from Manchester United dismissing Louis Van Gaal?

Following his dismissal by Manchester United Football Club it has been reported that Louis Van Gaal is likely to receive compensation between £4.5 and £5 million. Any senior, well paid executive is likely to have a significant claim for compensation if they are dismissed in breach of contract. With stakes high, employers need to make sure they are properly prepared for a parting of the ways by drafting adequate protections in their employment contracts.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you