Twitter/X to collect employment history and biometric data

-

In a recent development, X, previously recognised as Twitter, has announced amendments to its privacy policy, ushering in changes that include the collection of employment history and biometric data.

The updated privacy policy also outlines X’s intention to potentially gather information related to users’ employment and educational histories. This data collection is proposed to be used for the purpose of suggesting job opportunities to users and facilitating their job applications, possibly with the aim of venturing into recruitment services.

Reports suggest that X Corp, under the ownership of Elon Musk, had acquired a tech recruiting service named Laskie in May. This acquisition marked a significant step for X as it expanded its services beyond its original scope.

The revised privacy policy is scheduled to come into effect on September 29th and states, “We may collect and use your personal information (such as your employment history, educational history, employment preferences, skills and abilities, job search activity and engagement, and so on) to recommend potential jobs for you, to share with potential employers when you apply for a job, to enable employers to find potential candidates, and to show you more relevant advertising.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Why collect employment history?

Twitter seems to be gearing up for a new feature that enables verified organisations using the platform to showcase job openings on their profiles.

While Twitter has not formally unveiled this job posting feature, some verified organisations have already been granted the ability to display job listings beneath their Twitter bios on their profiles. These listings conveniently direct potential applicants to the company’s website, where they can explore job details and submit their applications.

X: What does the future look like?

Regarding the collection of biometric data, which encompasses physical attributes like facial scans and fingerprints, X clarified that this would specifically apply to X Premium users. X explained to the BBC that users of X Premium would have the option to provide their government ID and a selfie for identity verification. Biometric data could then be extracted from both the government ID and the selfie to enhance security and combat impersonation attempts.

Elon Musk, the owner of X, also reiterated the platform’s plans to introduce video and audio calling features, emphasising that these features would be compatible with various devices, including iOS, Android, Mac, and PC. Notably, Musk emphasised that no phone number would be required for this feature, positioning X as a versatile global communication platform.

While Musk envisions X transforming into an “everything app,” offering a wide range of services, including these new communication features, a specific release date for the calling functionality was not disclosed. As X continues to evolve and expand its offerings, further updates to its privacy policy may follow suit.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Shreena Patel: How important is your appearance at work? Not as important as you think

We've all heard the saying: "dress for the job you want" but how seriously do we consider our appearance at work and does it even matter?

Katherine Conway: How can we beat unconscious gender bias in the workplace?

It’s easy to assume that the business case for gender parity has been won. Innumerable studies have shown the benefits of greater gender equality in the workplace and of introducing more women to leadership positions. One recent study estimated that gender parity could add $12 trillion to the global economy, while others have found that companies with women on their boards outperform those with all-male boards, leading to an opportunity cost of $655 billion a year in the U.S., U.K. and India alone.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you