COVID-19: key workers were put at an “unacceptable” risk

-

“The threat of workplace infections was not insurmountable. But many workers were put at unacceptable risk – especially key workers on the frontline,” says TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady.

On the 8th April, the TUC published its submission to the Covid-19 public inquiry consultation on its terms of reference, which closed on the 7th.

Unions welcome both the commitment from the chair of the inquiry Baroness Hallett to consultation and transparency, and the commitment to examine the unequal impacts on different sectors of the population, such as BME and disabled workers.

However, the TUC says that the Prime Minister’s draft terms of reference should be expanded to fully cover the experiences of workers in the pandemic – especially those who remained in workplaces throughout lockdowns.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

These workers faced greater risks and unions are concerned that many of them were impacted by a lack of adequate PPE, lax workplace safety, and inadequate enforcement.

 

TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady:

Stating that “everyone has a right to be safe at work,” O’Grady also asserts that the “inquiry must take a deep dive into workplace safety – especially into those workplaces and sectors where outbreaks occurred, and where government Covid safety rules fell short.

“And the inquiry must look in detail into how some workers – especially Black and minority ethnic, disabled and women workers – were particularly hard hit by the response to the pandemic.

“Everyone must be heard for real lessons to be learned. So we encourage the inquiry to listen directly to working people and their unions. We stand ready to work with Baroness Hallett and her team.”

 

Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC, who leads the legal team for the TUC, said:

“In launching this consultation Baroness Hallett rightly emphasised that the terms of reference must properly reflect the public concerns. We agree.

“The Covid-19 pandemic and the response to it has had an impact on almost every aspect of our daily lives, from health and education to workplace safety and personal freedoms. The terms of reference must reflect this if the Covid-19 Inquiry is to be fit for purpose.

“However, the Prime Minister’s current draft is limited and overlooks key issues of profound public concern. Sectors which were severely impacted during the pandemic, such as education, transport, retail, manufacturing, construction and the creative industries, have been omitted. This must change.

“We call on the Prime Minister to ensure that the final terms of reference are broadened, and enable the Chair to proceed with her vital work.”

 

 

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Maria Chadwick: A guide to dealing with sexual harassment in the workplace

High profile scandals in Hollywood and Westminster have led to a flurry of disturbing tales of abuses of power, sexual harassment and inappropriate behaviour in the working environment.

Dr Mark Winwood: Some employees will lie when they’re sick – but it’s not all dishonest

The first Monday of February has come to be known as ‘National Sickie Day’ – the day that employees are supposed to be most likely to call in sick. Employment law firm ELAS, which has promoted the notion, maintains that a combination of miserable weather, commuting in the dark, post-Christmas credit card bills and long gap between holidays makes the first Monday of February the day that people are most likely to take some unofficial time off.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you