COVID-19: key workers were put at an “unacceptable” risk

-

“The threat of workplace infections was not insurmountable. But many workers were put at unacceptable risk – especially key workers on the frontline,” says TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady.

On the 8th April, the TUC published its submission to the Covid-19 public inquiry consultation on its terms of reference, which closed on the 7th.

Unions welcome both the commitment from the chair of the inquiry Baroness Hallett to consultation and transparency, and the commitment to examine the unequal impacts on different sectors of the population, such as BME and disabled workers.

However, the TUC says that the Prime Minister’s draft terms of reference should be expanded to fully cover the experiences of workers in the pandemic – especially those who remained in workplaces throughout lockdowns.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

These workers faced greater risks and unions are concerned that many of them were impacted by a lack of adequate PPE, lax workplace safety, and inadequate enforcement.

 

TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady:

Stating that “everyone has a right to be safe at work,” O’Grady also asserts that the “inquiry must take a deep dive into workplace safety – especially into those workplaces and sectors where outbreaks occurred, and where government Covid safety rules fell short.

“And the inquiry must look in detail into how some workers – especially Black and minority ethnic, disabled and women workers – were particularly hard hit by the response to the pandemic.

“Everyone must be heard for real lessons to be learned. So we encourage the inquiry to listen directly to working people and their unions. We stand ready to work with Baroness Hallett and her team.”

 

Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC, who leads the legal team for the TUC, said:

“In launching this consultation Baroness Hallett rightly emphasised that the terms of reference must properly reflect the public concerns. We agree.

“The Covid-19 pandemic and the response to it has had an impact on almost every aspect of our daily lives, from health and education to workplace safety and personal freedoms. The terms of reference must reflect this if the Covid-19 Inquiry is to be fit for purpose.

“However, the Prime Minister’s current draft is limited and overlooks key issues of profound public concern. Sectors which were severely impacted during the pandemic, such as education, transport, retail, manufacturing, construction and the creative industries, have been omitted. This must change.

“We call on the Prime Minister to ensure that the final terms of reference are broadened, and enable the Chair to proceed with her vital work.”

 

 

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Claudia Cooney: Top ten ways to promote employee happiness

So, here’s a question for you, are you guilty...

Nigel Watson: Shares for rights – A diamond in disguise

New law As of 1 September 2013, a new employment...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you