Khyati Sundaram: How to improve candidate experience to win top talent

-

Record-level vacancies mean that recruiting is no easy job right now. But whilst employers are acutely aware of the need to attract talent, few recognise the ways in which they are repelling some of the top candidates – through selection processes themselves, and through candidates’ experience of them. By overhauling hiring systems and improving candidate experience in the process, companies can make the best and most diverse hires possible. Khyati Sundaram explains how… 

 

Anonymise applications

A candidates’ marital status, name or postcode says nothing of their ability to do a job. Instead, this kind of information leads hiring teams to lean into biases which can see women, minority ethnic and lower socio-economic groups passed over for jobs. 

Anonymous applications ensure that decisions are based on talent alone, boosting the diversity and quality of hires: 60 percent of those hired following this approach would be missed during traditional CV sifts. 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Plus, our research shows that when businesses are upfront about using anonymous applications, a wider and more diverse talent pool is encouraged to apply – since candidates can be confident in the knowledge that they are being judged fairly. 

 

Assess skills, not experience 

One of the biggest pain points for candidates is having to regurgitate information on their CVs when filling out applications.

Instead of asking applicants to recite their academic and employment histories, ask questions which determine whether their skills match those required for specific roles, using work samples and cognitive ability tests for example. 

As with identifying information, taking experience out of the equation will not reduce the quality of your hires. In fact, skills are 3x more predictive of performance than CVs. And when hiring decisions are based on true potential rather than bias, marginalised talent shines through: leading to up to four times more minority ethnic hires, and up to 70 percent more women in senior roles. 

 

Streamline the process 

Hiring processes are made notoriously lengthy by traditional assessments which waste candidates’ time, money and patience. And since they are often prone to bias and poor indicators of performance, they are a waste for employers, too. 

Cover letters are a reflection of writing skills rather than those needed for specific jobs, unstructured interviews focus on culture-fit rather than role fit, and reference checks are unreliable since candidates only ever name contacts they know will provide a glowing review.

With skills tests in place, there is no need for all these unnecessary stages, and candidates will no doubt be relieved to see the back of them.

 

Be human and communicate

Removing human bias from hiring processes doesn’t mean you cannot be human in other ways. Using simple, friendly and encouraging language throughout online and in-person interactions with candidates is one of the simplest ways you can put them at ease and improve their experience. Just be mindful to treat all candidates the same. 

Communicating next steps throughout the process will also ensure that applicants don’t feel neglected or worry needlessly in-between different stages. And all candidates – successful or not – deserve feedback. There’s no excuse for professional ghosting – especially when skills-based hiring tech makes the whole process objective and automatic. 

 

Be transparent

To give candidates a fair chance to prepare and put their best foot forward during any assessments, they need to know upfront exactly what to expect. 

In particular, be mindful that not everyone is familiar with skills-based assessments. Take the time to explain what anonymous applications and work samples entail, and how their purpose is to give candidates a fair chance, rather than to trip them up. 

Companies should also be transparent about salaries. Particularly during a cost of living crisis, job seekers cannot be expected to invest time in applying to companies where they do not know what they can expect to earn. To empower women to negotiate salaries on a fairer basis and improve the gender balance of applicants, salary disclosure on job adverts and beyond is essential.

Employers are acutely aware of the need to attract talent. But few recognise the ways in which they are repelling some of the top candidates- through selection processes themselves, and through candidates’ experience of them. By overhauling hiring systems and improving candidate experience in the process, companies can make the best and most diverse hires possible. 

__

Khyati Sundaram is CEO of debiased hiring experts, Applied.

CEO at 

Khyati Sundaram is the CEO of Applied: a behavioural science-backed tool which helps companies hire fairly and without bias. Before joining Applied, Khyati co-founded her own company and also worked in investment banking with JP Morgan and RBS. She also holds an MSc in Economics from the London School of Economics, as well as an MBA from the London School of Business.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Emerging talent – Is it time to go back to the drawing board?

Graduates have long been a reliable source of entry level recruits to ensure steady future talent pipelines. But in an increasingly VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous) environment, HR leaders are going back to the drawing board when it comes to connecting with early in careers candidates.

Hannah Parsons: Winter commuting – is it legal not to pay staff that can’t get into work?

With heavy snowfall already upon us, UK commuters are once again facing the prospect of travel disruptions that will hamper their sterling attempts to get to work
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you