CIPD offers policy help to bosses facing world cup absences

-

The CIPD has launched guidelines for employers to minimise problems caused by staff absence during the World Cup tournament, starting next month.

Nine out of 10 employers have no plans in place to help manage staff absence during the forthcoming World Cup, according to a poll by the CIPD.

The poll of more than 1,000 employers shows that almost all (90%) of organisations have not developed a policy to manage staff absence during the World Cup. Just 5% have developed a policy while a further 5% are currently developing one.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In view of these results, the CIPD has produced a guide for employers – The World Cup and Absence Management. The guidance suggests different approaches that employers can consider to help employees enjoy the matches that are important to them without compromising the needs of the business. These may include flexible working hours, shift swaps, unpaid leave and special screening of matches on premises.

The guide also advises employers to make organisational policy clear on absence, whether alcohol-related or not. Employers should make clear to workers that there are disciplinary consequences for taking unauthorised time off without good reason or for not performing satisfactorily or misbehaving at work.

The CIPD suggests employers should encourage workers to use annual leave, particularly to discourage general absenteeism and poor performance through over-indulging in alcohol.

CIPD adviser John McGurk said: “It’s alarming that only 10% of employers are drafting or already have guidance in place to manage absence during the World Cup. Research suggests that when employers demonstrate they care about their staff and their interests outside of work, employees are more likely to go the extra mile for the organisation. Whatever individual organisations decide is right for their employees, guidance should be clear and communicated well.”



Latest news

Exclusive: London bus drivers’ ‘dignity’ at risk as strikes loom over welfare concerns

London bus drivers raise concerns over fatigue and lack of facilities as potential strikes escalate long-standing welfare issues.

Whistleblowing reports ‘surge by up to 250 percent’ at councils as new rights take effect

Whistleblowing cases are rising across UK councils as stronger workplace protections come into force, though concerns remain about underreporting of serious issues.

Bullying and harassment to become regulatory breaches under new FCA rules

New rules will bring bullying and harassment into regulatory scope, as firms face rising reports of workplace misconduct.

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.
- Advertisement -

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Must read

Rhiannon Barry: The rise of AI in Human Resources

With the potential to dramatically increase efficiency, productivity and accuracy, AI can revolutionise how organisations manage people operations.

Luke Aaron: The role of investigative evidence services in employment cases

There is a trend for employment lawyers to be called in to protect the rights and reputation staff leaving businesses, to help prove that they are NOT guilty of stealing IP. How can digital forensic services and 'ediscovery' be used in these cases?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you