Business groups unite to condemn new HMRC red tape on flexible workers

-

UK business groups have come together to express their deep concerns about new regulations introduced by HMRC. The proposals will create unnecessary and excessive red tape which will seriously disrupt the labour market.

Sounding the alarm on the new regulations are IPSE (Independent Professionals and the Self-Employed), REC (Recruitment and Employment Confederation), FCSA (Freelance and Contractor Services Association) and APSCo, (Association of Professional Staffing Companies.)

The proposals, which follow the ‘onshore intermediaries’ legislation introduced earlier this year will mean recruitment firms will have to collect, verify and report sensitive information about self-employed workers and company directors to HMRC. Whilst some reporting is needed to enforce the changes, these obligations go well beyond what is required. They will create a huge administrative burden and introduce risks in handling personal data, including age, gender and National Insurance number. For freelancers, the rules will require them to collect this information from anyone they subcontract work to.

Simon McVicker, Director of Policy and External Relations at IPSE, said

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Throughout the consultation process, we have been repeatedly assured that legitimate independent professionals would not be affected by these new rules. It is therefore all the more ridiculous to find that thousands of freelancers will be forced to conform to the onerous reporting requirements now outlined in the draft statutory instrument. The regulations will strongly discourage independent professionals from subcontracting and collaborating with others.”

According to CEO of the REC Kevin Green “Obtaining the information required by the regulations will pose a challenge for our members, especially where they do not have a direct relationship with the self-employed worker. We fail to see why this is necessary, given the government already collects much of the required information, for example through RTI reports.”

Samantha Hurley, Head of External Relations at APSCo, believes the reporting requirements must be changed so that only company and payment information is sought. Removing the need to report personal data would significantly reduce the burden on recruitment firms and minimise the potential for data loss:

“As legitimate businesses, the independent professionals in question operate through limited companies, the details of which are already in the public domain. There is no reason for personal data to be collected on the individuals who own these businesses when the company information already available fulfils all the requirements of the new rules.”

FCSA Chief Executive, Julia Kermode, believes the government has not fully considered the cost implications of the proposals: “These regulations will impose a significant cost burden on businesses. Installing systems that can securely collect and store data is not cheap, one of our members has set aside a six figure sum to achieve this. For some small businesses it will be prohibitively expensive.”

IPSE, REC, FCSA and APSCo would like the Government to review these proposals as a matter of urgency, with a view to removing completely the need for recruitment firms to report the personal details of limited company directors.

Charles Staples is an editorial assistant at HRreview.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Steve Othen: Is the candidate experience really that important?

There is currently a gap between what candidates expect...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you