Loyal employees will earn 50% less over their lifetime than those who ‘jump ship’ every two years

-

shutterstock

Forbes magazine has undertaken research and found that employees who ‘jump ship’ every two years and find a new job, will, over their working lifetime, earn double that of the loyal worker who remains with the same employer for many years.

How can this be?

Well the average worker in 2014 will receive a 3% pay rise but if you subtract the effect of inflation, that works out to only around a 1% raise. However, employees going to new jobs will often receive a pay increase of 10% to 20% and possibly even that promotion that they could not get at their old job.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Forbes says the problem is that, particularly due to the long recession, many companies have introduced pay freezes.

Bethany Devine, a Senior Hiring Manager in California’s Silicon Valley who has worked with many Fortune 500 companies told Forbes: “I would often see resume’s that only had a few years at each company. I found that the people who had switched companies usually commanded a higher salary

“The problem with staying at a company forever is you start with a base salary and usually annual raises are based on a percentage of your current salary.

“However, if you move to another company, you start fresh and can usually command a higher base salary to hire you.

“Companies competing for talent are often not afraid to pay more when hiring if it means they can hire the best talent.”

Bethany went on to say that promotions work in a similar fashion. Quite often there is a ‘waiting list’ for promotions and that can stall advancement. But if you take on a new job and you have the relevant skills then you may be able to jump straight into a promoted position.

Brendan Burke, Director at Headwaters HW, agreed, saying that “companies turn over great employees because they’re not organisationally strong enough to support rapid development within their ranks.”

However, Christine Mueller, President of TechniSearch Recruiters, said that some of her clients “will not consider anyone who has had more than three jobs in the last ten years, no matter the reason.” Even so, Ms. Mueller still recommends that an employee change jobs every three to four years in order to maximise their salary.  So, the question is less about whether employees should jump ship, but how long they should wait before jumping!

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Mark Leisegang: What the Ryder Cup can teach us about people and performance

The Ryder Cup is a test of nerve, a masterclass in teamwork, and a stage where chemistry often beats raw talent. While fans see the drama and rivalries, HR leaders can look deeper.

Mental health in the mainstream

Making mental health mainstream could convince more people to seek help if they are struggling, but there cannot be positive change if there aren’t enough forms of support available to meet increasing demand.  
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you