Quotas won’t help women in business, say Lords

-

Peers oppose EU plans to introduce quotas for women in business

Ahead of the EU’s expected announcement of legislation to tackle gender inequality in the corporate world, a Lords Committee says today that introducing mandatory quotas for the number of women on EU boards would “generate negative perceptions amongst women and business leaders and would not address the root causes of inequality”.

In its report, Women on Boards, the Lords EU Committee says that whilst they agree there is a leadership role for the EU in furthering the cause of increased equality in the boardroom, quotas would “risk setting back voluntary efforts without achieving broader gains”, and urges the Government to strongly oppose any such measure.

The Committee instead calls on the European Commission to bring forward measures to monitor the number of women in senior positions on an EU-wide basis. The Commission should also facilitate self-regulatory efforts in Member States which can highlight good and bad performers, giving voluntary efforts a chance to succeed, before quotas are considered.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Committee Chairman, Baroness O’Cathain, said:

“Although the Committee welcomes the positive steps already taken by many Member States to ensure more gender-balanced boards and senior management teams – particularly in the UK – the number of women at the top remains far too low.

“More balanced boards are to everybody’s benefit. We found that they will be more able to tap into the wealth of available talent in the labour market, provide a broader spectrum of ideas and improve corporate governance. However, we are not persuaded that the only way to stimulate change is through the introduction of EU quotas.

“National governments are already signed up to the benefits of more women on boards, and there has been real progress. More than a third of people appointed to FTSE 100 boards last year were women, and FTSE 100 companies are expecting to see a quarter of their board positions taken by women by 2015. Across the EU as a whole, the proportion of women on boards has risen by 16% since 2010. Business leaders and national governments need to be given a chance to build upon these efforts before we consider quotas.”

“The Commission should at this stage seek to support and better monitor these efforts, and only step in with stronger measures as a last resort where the business world has shown itself to be unwilling and unable to change its ways. To introduce quotas now, though, would do more harm than good and risk derailing efforts to deliver more sustainable change.”

“By working together in partnership, the Government and the EU can ensure that all of the talent in our jobs market is used to the full, regardless of gender.”

The key recommendations from the Committee are:

  • a legislative quota would be unpopular with many of the women it would seek to help, and the Government should strongly oppose any such measure that emerges – a voluntary, business-led approach is the better route to long-lasting change;
  • the European Commission should continue to show leadership on the issue of women on boards by maintaining a high profile on this issue and holding Member States to account;
  • corporate governance regimes should be reformed to require companies to report at a national level on the proportion of women at every level of their workforce;
  • the Commission should use the above data to determine on an annual basis if progress is being made at Member State and EU levels, and to inform possible policy responses; and
  • the principles in the UK’s code of conduct for executive search firms should be implemented on a voluntary basis across the EU.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Chris Welford: The human aspects of change

Why does change fail to deliver? There are many...

Hannah Crawley: Graduates need an escape from traditional assessment

Nationwide is now assessing the competencies and potential of graduates in a more engaging and meaningful way, says Hannah Crawley.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you