Spring Statement: wage increases confirmed as welfare cuts spark criticism

-

Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered the Spring Statement on Wednesday, unveiling a £14 billion package aimed at supporting the UK economy. Key measures include increases to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage, alongside a £1 billion investment to help people return to work.

However, further cuts to welfare have drawn criticism, with concerns that they could push vulnerable people into financial hardship.

Reeves confirmed that from 1 April, the National Living Wage will rise by 6.7 percent from £11.44 to £12.21 per hour. The National Minimum Wage for 18 to 20-year-olds will see a larger increase of 16.3 percent, rising from £8.60 to £10 per hour.

Alongside wage increases, Reeves announced a £1 billion investment in tailored employment support, set to begin next year. The government aims to get more people into work, but at the same time, welfare cuts have raised concerns. Critics warn that the cuts could have negative consequences for those struggling to enter or remain in the workforce.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Concerns over welfare cuts and their impact on employment

The government’s welfare changes, confirmed in the Spring Statement, have been met with criticism. Ben Harrison, Director of the Work Foundation at Lancaster University, questioned whether the cuts would deliver the intended benefits.

“Making cuts of this nature risks making it significantly harder for many people to access employment,” Harrison said. “The OBR has been unable to fully certify the impact the proposed welfare cuts will have on reducing spending and getting people back to work, but the verdicts of those groups representing disabled people are clear about the substantial impact on living standards they are likely to have on some of the most vulnerable people in society.”

Harrison welcomed the additional funding for employment support but warned that cuts affecting disabled people could increase financial insecurity and lead to unsuitable job placements.

Trade unions have also raised concerns. Paul Nowak, General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), warned against policies that could worsen inequality – although he welcomed the pledge to invest on public services.

“Labour inherited a toxic economic legacy from the Conservatives,” Nowak said. “But at the Budget the Chancellor took the right call to invest in repairing our public services and infrastructure. To rebuild Britain this approach must continue long-term. In the face of strong global headwinds, we need to keep building stronger foundations at home. That must include protecting the most vulnerable.”

Nowak also criticised the government’s approach to welfare reform. “Ministers need to rethink their plans. Decisions that affect millions of people’s lives must be made with care – not as a last-minute response to changed fiscal forecasts,” he said. “These changes mean many disabled people – whether they are in work or not – will be pushed into hardship. Removing support could even make it harder for some people to stay in their jobs.”

Business groups call for greater employer support

Business organisations have warned that further action is needed to support employers. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) responded to the Spring Statement saying that the government must work with businesses to address cost pressures and regulatory challenges.

Ben Willmott, Head of Public Policy at CIPD, welcomed the support for key sectors and plans to boost investment in infrastructure and housing – but noted that there was “no recognition” of the need to provide more support for employers.

“The Government has been quick to add costs and regulation to businesses through national insurance hikes and the Employment Rights Bill, which have created clear headwinds for employers in terms of additional costs and implementation challenges,” he said. “We now need to see the Government back businesses by setting out how it will work with employers to address these challenges and boost productivity, as together these measures stand to undermine business investment in workforce training and employment.”

He urged the government to work closely with employers to ensure that new regulations do not discourage hiring, particularly for younger workers and those needing additional support. He also called for a clear implementation plan for the Employment Rights Bill, including additional funding for ACAS and the employment tribunal system to handle expected increases in claims.

“If the government wants to see more people in work, then there must be jobs for them to go to,” he said.

The need for skills investment was another key issue. Willmott suggested fast-tracking consultations on the Growth and Skills Levy to help businesses invest in training. “We also need the government to back recommendations from the Keep Britain Working review and improve access to occupational health support for SMEs,” he said.

Calls for a stronger economic strategy

The Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) echoed concerns about the lack of employer-focused policies. Neil Carberry, Chief Executive of REC, stressed that economic growth depends on private sector success and that business confidence is being undermined by tax increases and regulatory uncertainty.

“Success for the Chancellor and this government comes from economic growth and the Chancellor was right to emphasise this today,” Carberry said. “But economic growth comes from private sector success – generating the income that funds jobs, tax revenues and ultimately our public services. On that, we remain at a crossroads.”

Carberry pointed to concerns over the upcoming rise in Employer’s National Insurance, as well as what he described as “anti-business rhetoric” from parts of government. He argued that the government’s broader economic strategy must include reforms to the apprenticeship levy, reducing bureaucratic burdens on businesses and closer collaboration with employers to support long-term labour market stability.

Image credit: Alecsandra Dragoi/HM Treasury

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Seren Trewavas: What can you learn from Google when it comes to assessing talent?

Google is well known for its tough interview process...

Susan Stick: Four day working weeks: Can you really maintain productivity with less time?

"Your brain needs to recharge as much as your laptop does."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you