HSE Costs Recovery will scare employers from seeking advice

-

Nearly half of leading employers surveyed at the IOSH conference in March by business law firm, DWF, admitted to having apprehensions about the new Fee for Intervention (FFI).

The new FFI cost, which the Government recently announced will now be delayed until the autumn, will be incurred when a contravention – that is a failure to observe health and safety law requiring a formal action – is discovered during a HSE inspection or investigation. The business will continue to accrue FFI until the business has put matters right with the support of the HSE.

Steffan Groch, Head of Regulatory Litigation, at DWF said:

“Almost half of all respondents (47%) are concerned that the introduction of the Fee for Intervention will make businesses think twice before seeking advice from the HSE.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“More worrying still, a quarter weren’t aware of the HSE’s proposals, despite the obvious impacts on their businesses – a sign perhaps that the proposals have failed to be publicised sufficiently.”

Groch continued:

“While most of the nations’ leading employers are accepting of the new scheme, there is deep rooted anxiety that the high costs of FFI will have negative effects on British businesses. 49% of respondents said the £124 per hour cost of FFI is likely to negatively and disproportionately impact upon small and medium sized businesses.

“Alarmingly a third of employers we surveyed rejected the proposals all together.

“For those who are supporting the introduction of FFI, there is a desire to see that the HSE implements the scheme fairly, and the conference attendees showed widespread support for the application of a sliding cost scale, based on the size of the business, ability to pay, and the type of intervention that the HSE has to undertake.

“While we will have to wait to see what the true cost is to British businesses it appears we will be waiting in the dark as businesses are left without the well-overdue guidance they require to adequately prepare for this overhaul of the system.”

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Robert Leeming: Are internships making the UK’s creative industry a middle class only affair?

An honest day’s pay for an honest day’s work. That has always been the adage that has kept the wheels of capitalism turning for generations. If you mentioned the notion of working for free to anyone from an older generation, they would find the idea abhorrent. They would slam the notion as exploitation, as not the way that things are supposed to work. And they would be right.

Rhian Brace: Drugs at work

When it comes to policy and regulation, it is...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you