Training Budgets fall foul of cuts

-

61% of L&D Managers agree that the training budget is the first to be cut when times are tough

Bracknell, 14 Feb 2012: Six out of ten learning & development managers say that their training budget is one of the first to be cut when times are hard, according to a survey by KnowledgePool, the managed learning company.

104 L&D managers were asked about their perception of training within their organisation, 61% claim that cost cutting exercises during times of financial constraint hit the training budget hard and fast. However the solution to this, may well lie in their own hands; 79% agreed that the sector needed to improve the way training was evaluated, and that ROI in training could be improved.

Kevin Lovell, Learning Consultancy Director at KnowledgePool agrees. “Drastic L&D cuts are not the answer in these tough times,” he explains. “Training that is tightly aligned to business goals is much more important. It ensures that businesses are in good shape to weather current storms and take advantage of the recovery when it comes. One of the great challenges for L&D is how to take a business-oriented view of learning.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The problem, according to Lovell, is that it is much easier to see training as a cost rather than an investment; and cutting costs by improving efficiency or reducing waste is uncomfortable but defensible in the current climate.

However, the way savings are made often points to an underlying problem. “We know a great deal about what learning costs, but very little about its value to an organisation. Our approach to the evaluation of learning involves post-training analysis which is time consuming, costly and by the time you get the result, it’s too late”.

KnowledgePool’s Lovell suggests a more pro-active approach to assessing ROI.

“Our suggestion is that, rather than trying to assess the business benefit after the training, why not think about the likely business benefit before it takes place? It is quite possible to estimate the expected value of a learning activity at the planning stage – you do it by asking these sorts of questions:

* What business issues do you expect the training will resolve or diminish?
* What business improvements or behavioural changes are you expecting to see after the training, that you can’t see now?
* What past experiences make you think that the proposed learning will achieve these changes?

By asking these questions, you can quickly assess the business value of the proposed learning. Having done that, a number of possibilities open up:

* You can see how well your proposed learning aligns to the business strategy.
* You can estimate the return on investment (ROI) of the proposed learning.
* You can prioritise your learning according to the level of business impact.
* You can tell your business managers the impact of not doing whatever training doesn’t fit within the budget you’ve got.
* You can begin to argue for training budget on a commercial business basis, instead of saying ‘it’s really important’.

“The important thing is you’ll be talking to your business managers using commercial language they will understand,” says Lovell. “We are talking about estimates here, but our experience of analysing learning outcomes after the event shows that most outcomes (good and bad) are not unexpected and could have been anticipated at the outset.”

Managed learning companies like KnowledgePool help L&D managers educate the business on training that delivers results. In today’s tough economic climate it is even more important to focus training budget correctly and contribute to business growth through improving skills.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Max St. John: Can the workplace really be democratic? Five things to consider

Organisational democracy is still a fairly misunderstood concept. For...

Three reasons why HR should worry when engaging contractors overseas

HR departments engaging contractors overseas should have tax compliance at the top of their agenda if they want to mitigate the very real risks of prosecution, according to 6CATS.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you