Employers are in favour of employment tribunal fees

-

The majority of employers are in favour of introducing employment tribunal fees – nearly 80 per cent said that they thought it would reduce litigation.

The findings from Eversheds also highlight that there is support for elevated charges for those who wish to pursue a claim above the £30,000 award cap. More than 60 per cent agreed that this measure would deter high-value cases.

Geoffrey Mead, Partner at Eversheds, believes that the Coalition should be concerned about this finding as it may put off legitimate discrimination, whistle-blowing or equal pay claims.

He said: “This threshold was proposed by the Government with the stated aim of assisting employers by providing certainty as to the value of any claim.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Despite the positive response to these costs, there was division between the two proposed charging options.

There are two choices up for consultation. The first is to introduce an initial fee of between £150–£250. This would be followed by an additional cost of around £250–£1,250 if it proceeds to a hearing, with no limit on the amount awarded.

The second suggestion is a single fee of £200–£600 with an award limit of £30,000. At this point an individual could pay an additional £1,750 in order to seek compensation above this threshold.

In both cases the tribunal would have the right to order the unsuccessful party to reimburse the fees to the other party.

Pamela Flores is an events professional with experience at Symposium Events, a UK-based conference and events organization. She has worked in editorial and event coordination roles within the HR and expatriate management sector, contributing to the organization of major conferences including the Expatriate Management and Global Mobility conference. Her background spans online editorial work and events management within the professional conference industry.

Latest news

England’s overnight World Cup clash and 5am pub opening prompt CIPD advice

The CIPD is urging organisations to agree any flexibility before England's 1am World Cup last-16 tie to help minimise disruption at the start of the working week.

Russell Cowley: Gen Z – rebuilding workplace culture, break by break

Gen Z workers are taking proper breaks and in doing so, they may be fixing something the rest of us broke.

Fit for Work: Weekend warrior? You can still reap the health benefits

Weekend exercise can still improve long-term health, even for people who struggle to fit physical activity into the working week.

Superdry co-founder’s victim warns workplace power can silence abuse victims

A survivor's account raises questions about speaking-up cultures and accountability in organisations.
- Advertisement -

UK’s always-on work culture ‘driving employee burnout’

Nearly half of UK workers say they end most working days mentally exhausted as rising workplace pressure leaves employees and managers struggling to switch off.

Andrew Murray on why no two days look alike

A people development leader shares how travel, training and a passion for helping others shape a working day with little room for routine.

Must read

Neil Purcell: Why recruitment without a research engine is like marketing without CRM

There’s no doubt we’re in the middle of a hiring crisis, with more vacancies than jobseekers for the first time, highlights Neil Purcell.

Chelsea Feeney: Supreme Court decision for Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers – implications for employers

On Wednesday 16 April 2025, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers. What does it mean?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you