Lucinda Bromfield: Belief in the sanctity of life protected by anti-discrimination legislation

-

In Hashman v Milton Park (Dorset) Ltd an Employment Tribunal held that a belief in the sanctity of life, including the lives of animals, was a ‘philosophical belief’ and protected under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. Therefore the employee was protected from being treated less favourably because of their philosophical belief.

The employee in this case was a fervent anti-hunting activist. He had been involved in animal welfare issues since he was 13 when he attended his first animal rights demonstration. He had been actively involved in animal rights issues for 30 years and was an active member of the Hunt Saboteurs Association and a committed vegan.

The Tribunal followed the test set out in Grainger (the case which decided that belief in climate change could be a protected belief). The test states that:

1. A belief has to be genuinely held; and
2. it must be a belief, not an opinion or a viewpoint; and
3. it must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour; and
4. it must be able to attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance; and
5. it must be worthy of respect in a democratic society, not incompatible with human dignity and not in conflict with the fundamental rights of others.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In both the Grainger and Hashman cases, the employees had incorporated their beliefs in to their lives in practical ways. This gives some comfort to employers and suggests that for a belief to be protected, it must have a significant impact on how an employee chooses to live his or her life.

Interestingly, the successful claimant was represented before the tribunal by a barrister by the name of Mr Hare – you couldn’t make it up.

This information is believed to be correct as of the date published. It is not a substitute for legal advice and no liability attaches to its use. Specific and personal legal advice should be taken on any individual matter.

Lucinda Bromfield, Employment Specialist, Bevans Solicitors

Lucinda Bromfield is an employment specialist at Bevans, advising on all aspects of employment law and alternative dispute resolution. Before becoming a solicitor she had experience of working in compliance and HR for large private and public sector organizations. She is a qualified mediator and has a particular interest in the role of effective communication and HR in building sustainable, profitable businesses.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Mark O’Hara: Right to Work checks are changing: what do you need to know?

If employers fail to observe the new guidelines, or if their policy is non-compliant, they can face severe penalties, warns Mark O'Hara.

Mike Hibbs: Sick leave, keeping your processes healthy

Two million people could benefit from the proposed change to SSP.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you