Atrium Underwriters’ ‘Boys’ Night Out’: toxic work culture still rife

-

Lloyd’s of London has issued a £1m fine to Atrium Underwriters because of tolerated discrimination, harassment and bullying over the numerous years.

This is the largest fine in Lloyd’s 336-year history.

These “serious failings” of the firm include a mishandling, bullying and harassment case, and also an inappropriate “Boys’ Night Out” event for staff.

This annual “Boys’ Night Out” saw employees, including two executives, taking part in heavy drinking, initiation games, and “discriminatory and harassing comments” directed towards female members of staff.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In response, Lloyds have launched a whistleblowing hotline, and have advanced policies targeted towards diversity and inclusion.

This confirms a recent report by CIPD, which highlights that interpersonal conflict and uncivil behaviour are still remarkably common in the workplace.

 

Lloyd’s disciplinary action to set an example

Chairman of Lloyds of London, Carnegie-Brown, said: “We continue to crackdown on bad behaviour. The important thing is we are taking action.”

“The market is becoming more diverse and inclusive,” Brown adds.

However, it is not this simple; women across the globe continue to face similar acts of discrimination in the workplace.

Almost a quarter (23%) of women between the ages of 16 and 30 have been sexually harassed at work (with only 8% reporting it), according to a poll by the Young Women’s Trust.

 

The importance of addressing bullying and harassment in the workplace

Bullying and harassment have extremely negative consequences for not only the victim, but also teams and organisations.

“It negatively impacts the attitudes, behaviour and health of staff, notably leading to higher levels of anxiety and depression, reduced self-esteem and performance, and increased absenteeism and turnover. It is vital that employers are equipped to understand where such behaviour stems from and how to prevent it,” says the CIPD report.

 

Prevention over cure

CIPD recommend focusing on the root cause of harassment within the workplace. They recommend that employers should:

  • Provide resources for staff to confidently approach workplace incivility
  • Ensure staff involvement in the implementation of the recourses to make interventions effective
  • Target both individual development and organisational processes through wide-ranging interventions

A toxic work culture breeds gender discrimination. Greater disciplinary policies like that exhibited by Lloyds should be adopted should similar actions occur within the workplace elsewhere.

Breeding a healthy workplace culture is essential in that is conducive to promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion.

 

What is the difference between bullying and harassment?

On a final note, it is important to separate the terms bullying and harassment, which are often used interchangeably. It is crucial for HR professionals to have a clear definition of the terms.

The Equality Act 2010 defines harassment as: ‘unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic, which has the purpose or effect of violating an individual’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for that individual.’

Bullying, whilst not specifically defined in UK law, is defined by Acas as: ‘offensive, intimidating, malicious or insulting behaviour, an abuse or misuse of power through means that undermine, humiliate, denigrate or injure the recipient.’

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Exclusive: London bus drivers’ ‘dignity’ at risk as strikes loom over welfare concerns

London bus drivers raise concerns over fatigue and lack of facilities as potential strikes escalate long-standing welfare issues.

Whistleblowing reports ‘surge by up to 250 percent’ at councils as new rights take effect

Whistleblowing cases are rising across UK councils as stronger workplace protections come into force, though concerns remain about underreporting of serious issues.

Bullying and harassment to become regulatory breaches under new FCA rules

New rules will bring bullying and harassment into regulatory scope, as firms face rising reports of workplace misconduct.

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.
- Advertisement -

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Must read

Florence Parot: Using technology

Last time we looked at how best to use our electronic devices at work. But there is also something to be said for how we use them outside work. Not only for our general life balance but also because that balance in itself will affect how efficient we can be at work. Our brain can only take so much as we have emphasized over the past months.

Alex Wilke: How a Chief Feedback Officer can improve employee feedback

Collecting and acting on feedback from employees and customers is becoming essential to successful business decision making, prompting discussions about the emergence of a new board level representative – the Chief Feedback Officer – to take control of the area.  What’s behind this idea and what exactly would someone with that job title do anyway?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you