Businesses planning furlough redundancies need to start now, law firm warns

-

Despite the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme coming to a close at the end of September, lawyers warn that planning redundancies should begin now. 

New research published by the Government shows that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme has supported a cumulative total of 11.6 million jobs since March 2020.

However, with new changes to employer contributions already coming into force, law firm Nelsons has warned that businesses should start planning ahead and thinking carefully about redundancies.

Laura Kearsley, partner and solicitor specialising in employment law at Nelsons, discusses the minimum consultation periods which must take place before redundancies take effect:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Faced with uncertain trading times for many businesses and now partial financial responsibility for all employees, many employers will need to review their workforce and requirements to consider whether current levels of staffing are sustainable.

If an employer intends to make more than 20 people redundant, this triggers collective consultation requirements, including minimum consultation periods during which redundancy dismissals cannot take effect. The consultation period for employers who anticipate making 100 or more people redundant is 45 days and for those anticipating making between 20 and 99 redundancies it is 30.

As such, Ms. Kearsley urges businesses to think about commencing redundancy consultations so they are in a position to make redundancies before the government funding reduces.

This includes complying with the requirements of collective consultations which involve liaising with recognised trade unions or elected employee representatives.

Furthermore, employers that are making any number of employees with more than two years’ continuous service redundant will need to adhere to minimum requirements in terms of consultation and meetings.

Ms. Kearsley clarifies that the legal obligations on employers who are thinking about redundancies will depend on how many staff they are planning to let go. She stated:

If you anticipate that you will have to make 20 or more people redundant at the same location within a set period, you will have a legal obligation to consult with employee representatives (these could be trade union representatives or colleagues elected for this purpose).

Regardless of the numbers, you should also follow a fair process where you meet with employees that are at risk of redundancy and listen to any suggestions the employees have for avoiding redundancies.

As such, Ms. Kearsley outlines the importance of consulting properly with staff at risk of redundancy before reaching a final decision.

This will involve holding meetings with employees to discuss the situation in more detail. At the end of the consultation period, employers will need to confirm who they are choosing to make redundant and whether an alternative to redundancy for certain roles has been found.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned that millions of people and their employers will be affected by the phasing out of the furlough scheme, with rising redundancies taking place over the summer months.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Jeremy Snape: Relentless or Resilient?

Today’s working week hardly leaves a moment for rest. Long hours at the office and little rest have become a part of most managers’ careers. Some feel forced into this cycle, while others take pride in how long they spend working and their constant availability to clients.

Erika Bannerman: Evidence that war for talent is emerging

If there is one thing that gives power to...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you