“Diversity is being invited to the party; inclusion is being asked to dance.”
Context
This widely quoted phrase from Verna Myers — a US-based diversity consultant and inclusion strategist — continues to capture the distinction between surface-level representation and meaningful participation. Originally shared in keynote talks and writing over a decade ago, the analogy remains a cornerstone of equity and inclusion training worldwide.
In 2025, the quote has resurfaced in conversations across the UK HR and legal landscape following a Supreme Court ruling that redefined the legal criteria for recognising gender identity in employment law. The judgement, which clarified the legal definition of “woman” for the purposes of single-sex spaces and services, has reignited public and workplace debates about identity, dignity and inclusion.
Myers’ quote offers a useful lens through which HR professionals can navigate these complex discussions, reminding employers that representation alone is insufficient without active efforts to include, respect and empower individuals in the workplace.
Meaning
The quote draws a clear distinction between:
Diversity: The presence of difference — whether in terms of gender, ethnicity, background or lived experience.
Inclusion: The practice of ensuring all individuals feel welcomed, valued and able to contribute meaningfully.
In HR terms, Myers suggests that inviting a broad range of people into an organisation is only the first step. The deeper challenge lies in removing barriers, ensuring equitable participation and creating a culture where every person — regardless of identity — feels seen, heard and respected.
In the wake of the UK Supreme Court’s ruling, the question for employers is no longer just who gets invited but how policies, language and leadership make space for everyone to engage authentically.
Implications
The ruling has added new complexity to how employers approach gender, inclusion and equality in the workplace. Key considerations for HR include:
Reviewing policies: Organisations may need to revisit internal definitions of gender, especially where they intersect with equality and safeguarding responsibilities.
Supporting line managers: Inclusion is lived at the team level. Managers will need practical tools and training to support conversations and decision-making that reflect legal clarity without undermining dignity.
Focusing on psychological safety: Regardless of legal definitions, employees want to feel safe, respected and understood. That means HR teams must continue to lead with empathy and ensure diverse voices are not only represented but invited to shape the culture.
Myers’ metaphor is especially relevant in this moment: as laws evolve, the challenge for employers is to keep moving beyond compliance to connection. HR has a central role to play in ensuring that diversity doesn’t stop at numbers but becomes embedded in behaviours, systems and everyday decisions.
