HRreview Header

Firm fined after worker suffers serious burns

-

A Nottinghamshire die-casting firm has been fined after an employee suffered severe burns when he fell into a furnace.

Keith Buckley, 59, from Mansfield, was removing equipment from the top of a magnesium furnace at Meridian Lightweight Technologies (UK) Ltd in readiness for the removal of the inner lining when the incident occurred on 16 May 2011.

A pump and tube had been removed and the hole stuffed with a soft wool material. As Mr Buckley walked across the top of the furnace his right foot went through the wool into the furnace, which was running at approximately 500 degrees.

His right foot became stuck in the magnesium melt but fortunately his shoe laces burned off, enabling him to push himself up and get his foot out of his boot and his leg out of the furnace.

Mr Buckley suffered severe burns to his lower right leg and required several skin grafts. He also burned his right hand, and still finds gripping problematic. He recently returned to work on short hours and lighter duties, but is unable to do his original job.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found the company had a written safe system of work, but it had never been seen by the people involved in the incident.

Mansfield Magistrates’ Court heard today (25 July) the system of work required the hole to be covered by a metal plate. Supervisors had not picked up that this was not being done, but dangerous practices were allowed to continue.

Meridian Lightweight Technologies (UK) Ltd, of Calladine Park, Orchard Way, Sutton-in-Ashfield, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 for safety failings. The company was fined £12,000 and ordered to pay costs of £6,472.

After the hearing HSE inspector Sian Tiernan said:

“This incident would never have happened if procedures had been effectively communicated and followed. Mr Buckley is very fortunate. If he hadn’t managed to release his foot from his boot his injuries would have been far worse, possibly even fatal.

“Just because procedures or safe systems of work are written down does not mean they are being followed. It is vital companies ensure employees have not only been trained in relevant safe systems of work but follow them. Measures must be in place to monitor work practices through effective supervision to ensure short cuts or dangerous acts or omissions are picked up before serious incidents occur.”

Latest news

James Rowell: The human side of expenses – what employee behaviour reveals about modern work

If you want to understand how your people really work, look at their expenses. Not just the total sums, but the patterns.

Skills overhaul needed as 40% of job capabilities set to change by 2030

Forecasts suggest 40 percent of workplace skills could change by 2030, prompting calls for UK employers to prioritise adaptability.

Noisy and stuffy offices linked to lost productivity and retention concerns

UK employers are losing more than 330 million working hours each year due to office noise, poor air quality and inadequate workplace conditions.

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.
- Advertisement -

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Must read

Richard Seabrook: Understanding how AI can improve efficiencies and minimise risks in the world of HR

The recent media interest about artificial intelligence (AI) has been inescapable. Contrary to popular belief, AI is not just about machine robotics and drones. Instead, it refers to the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence. But how might this type of technology help HR professionals?

Albert Bargery: Obesity and disability – what now for HR?

What does the recent obesity ruling by the ECJ mean for HR and employers - what adjustments will need to be made to ensure companies aren't left open to claims of discrimination?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you