HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Unions rally against government’s bid to reinstate employment tribunal fees

-

Unions and workers’ rights organisations in the UK are vehemently opposing the government’s plans to reintroduce fees for employment tribunals, warning that such a move could foster worker exploitation.

A coalition of 48 entities, including prominent names like the TUC, Citizens Advice, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the Fawcett Society, and Maternity Action, has expressed concerns that the reinstatement of fees, discarded in 2017, may empower unscrupulous employers.

The government, having previously faced legal challenges, abandoned its fee regime in 2017 when the supreme court ruled it obstructed access to justice, violating both UK and EU law.

The charges, ranging from £390 to £1,200 depending on the case, led to a nearly 70 percent reduction in cases brought forward by individuals after their introduction in 2013 by the then Lord Chancellor, Chris Grayling.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In a joint statement, the workers’ rights groups argue that the proposed fees, starting from £55 to initiate a claim, could discourage many from pursuing legitimate claims, granting an advantage to employers with questionable practices. They emphasised, “Bad employers are being given the go-ahead to undercut good ones, safe in the knowledge they are less likely to face claims in the employment tribunal… Employment rights are only real if they are enforced.”

A financial barrier

Despite the government’s assurance that the new fees are designed to be proportionate and affordable, the groups contend that the initial fee, covering a claim for multiple individuals, coupled with an additional £55 appeal fee per judgment, decision, direction, or order appealed against, could still pose a financial barrier. Complex cases, such as the prolonged dispute over employment status involving Uber drivers, could accumulate substantial costs for claimants over multiple appeals.

Last month, the government announced a consultation on reinstating fees, arguing that the proposed costs were low enough to enable workers to pursue low-value claims. It also pledged assistance for those unable to afford the fees and highlighted exemptions for individuals claiming their rights related to the national insurance fund, such as pension contributions or redundancy payments in cases of employer insolvency.

The government maintains that lessons learned from the 2017 experience have been considered, and the new fees will be proportionate and affordable in line with the supreme court’s judgment. The consultation period extends until March 25. The government estimates that the fees could generate up to £1.7 million annually from 2025, with last year’s employment tribunal operation costs reaching £80 million.

Paul Nowak, the general secretary of the TUC, emphasised the importance of ensuring that working people have the ability to enforce their rights. The debate surrounding the reintroduction of employment tribunal fees is expected to intensify as stakeholders engage in the ongoing consultation process.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Dr Rodrigo Rodriguez-Fernandez: Addressing men’s mental health in the workplace

As cost-of-living pressures, extreme weather-related events and geopolitical tensions persist, many employees are feeling mental health strain.

Jock Chalmers: A new version of Equality

Just in case you missed it, the Budget wasn’t...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you