Manual SAP® System Copy Drains Enterprise Efficiency

-

Inefficient process management costs enterprises up to £600,000 per year

Redwood Software, the IT and business process automation experts, uncover research data that manually undertaking SAP® system copy is time-consuming, expensive and inefficient.

SAP recommends that enterprises perform system copies to create test, demo and training systems. The process is also required for migration, disaster recovery, and when a company changes its operating system and/or database. It’s a critical operation for any SAP enterprise.

Independent research conducted by IZEN Marketing, on behalf of Redwood, calculated the significant costs and risks involved in manually executing SAP system copy. Researchers examined how many times enterprises undertake the manual process each year as well as the cost in time and human resources.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Research reveals:

  • 92 percent of respondents use at least five employees to manually run system copy, with some using 20 people or more to undertake the critical task
  • 61 percent of those surveyed claimed it takes five days to run the process manually, and 35 percent said the process takes even longer
  • 56 percent of the companies surveyed run system copy quarterly, with 25 percent running the process only every six months

This means that, based on an average employee’s daily working wage, most enterprises lose around £52,000 per year performing system copy manually. Organisations that invest particularly large amounts of human resources to the exercise may, in fact, lose up to £600,000 annually.

“Most companies now have to operate large and complex ERP systems landscapes”, says Dr. Derek Prior, Research Director at Gartner. “Regular system copies are important, but they are time-consuming and expensive if handled manually, which is what the great majority of IT departments do today.”

“It’s worrying that so many enterprises accept the status quo when it comes to undertaking critical processes within their organisation,” said Tijl Vuyk, CEO, at Redwood Software. “SAP system copy doesn’t get the attention it deserves, despite being essential for upgrades, testing and disaster recovery. Business are often reluctant to run system copy as often as they should because of the pain and costs associated with it. But putting system copy lower on the list of priorities only exacerbates other problems, creating a vicious circle. It’s actually in a company’s best interests to make sure the process is undertaken more frequently in an efficient and automated manner.”

“Business process automation can eliminate traditional barriers that have held enterprises back in the past. With end-to-end process automation, enterprises can be empowered to undertake SAP system copy more frequently, more effectively and with increased reliability. This subsequently helps to achieve greater IT alignment with the overarching business strategy,” concluded Vuyk.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

France is forcing its employees to power down: Will it work?

 is an author, Speaker, Consultant, Influencer, and Expert in all things workplace; Partner with PeopleResults. Here she discusses the new 'Right to Disconnect' law in France and how it has affected employees.

Fiona Young: How EAs are redefining their roles with AI & automation

Executive Assistants (EAs) are on the brink of a huge shift, as AI is rewriting the rulebook for what it means to be an EA.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you