41% of employees have their working time strictly monitored

-

A rigid and controlling leadership style is leaving U.K. employees feeling powerless and devalued, according to new global research by workplace culture expert O.C. Tanner.

The findings reveal that 41 percent of U.K. employees have their working time strictly monitored, with 39 percent admitting that leaders are constantly checking if they are on task during work hours.

Only 53 percent of employees are given the freedom to determine how they accomplish their work. When workplace flexibility is provided, it is often limited to specific job roles or ‘favourite employees’.

These findings are part of O.C. Tanner’s 2024 Global Culture Report, which collected data and insights from over 42,000 employees, leaders, HR practitioners, and executives across 27 countries, including 4,818 participants from the U.K.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Flexibility and autonomy are now expected

Robert Ordever, European Managing Director of O.C. Tanner, stated, “Work realities have shifted over the past few years. Employees now expect some level of flexibility and autonomy over their working day, including the tasks they focus on and when and how they accomplish them. Whether they work behind a desk, on a construction site, or in a factory, employees need to feel empowered and considered, not micromanaged. Unfortunately, there are still leaders who believe power and control get things done, signalling high levels of distrust and a lack of care.”

The report highlights the detrimental effects of a command-and-control leadership style. Employees with little or no flexibility in their roles feel that their opportunities for personal and professional growth are limited. Also, 38 percent of U.K. employees even report having their break times strictly monitored, making them feel undervalued and mistrusted. This leads to a higher likelihood of burnout and exhaustion, with burnout being five times more likely when employees are dissatisfied with their level of flexibility at work.

What should employers do?

The report recommends that leaders should offer every employee some level of job flexibility and influence while acknowledging the limitations of certain job roles. While it’s not possible to stock shelves or drive a truck from home, leaders can still empower employees by adjusting work schedules, accommodating changing life circumstances, allowing time for personal appointments, and giving employees greater control over their workload.

Currently, organisations commonly provide job flexibility to some but not all employees, with 56 percent of U.K. employees saying that flexibility is not uniformly available across all job roles. Additionally, 36 percent admit that leaders only grant flexibility and freedom to ‘favourite employees’.

Ordever adds, “Providing all employees with some level of autonomy and flexibility at work is crucial. Ensuring they feel seen and valued leads to thriving workplace cultures and better business outcomes.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Caroline Essex: Changes to pensions

Employers should be aware that, in October 2012, there...

Mathias Linnemann: Saying goodbye to bias in recruitment

How do you remove the bias from the recruitment process?  
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you