Sky Sports pundit wins £700,000 IR35 case

-

Former professional rugby union player turned Sky sports pundit, Stuart Barnes, has won a first-tier tax tribunal regarding his IR35 status, carrying £695,000 in tax liability.

Barnes’ limited company, S&L Barnes Limited, was under investigation for contracts held with Sky TV Limited, for the provision of punditry services between 2013 and 2019.

HMRC was of the view that Barnes should have been operating inside the IR35 legislation and, as a result, was demanding a total of £695,461.97 in tax. This was made up of £481,364.20 in PAYE and £214,097.77 in National Insurance Contributions (NICs).

However, Barnes successfully appealed at a first-tier tribunal held on 27-29th July 2022, with the verdict announced on 12th January 2023. The judge sided with Barnes, deeming the pundit not a disguised employee, and therefore belonging outside the IR35 legislation, due to being in ‘business on his own account’.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The case notes state: “The most compelling indicator is that the appellant’s contract with Sky was but one part of the brand, and contributed on average 60% of the appellant’s income, while over £150,000 on average would also be earned from other clients. Sky knew Barnes was in business on his own account and worked for other broadcasters; Sky welcomed that fact and wanted the world’s best commentator for the coverage.”

Dave Chaplin, CEO and founder of tax compliance firm IR35 Shield said: 

“This the fourth Sky TV-based case to be heard at the First-tier tribunal, and the first of those to be upheld.

“It is notable that Mr Barnes had lots of other work, outside of his Sky TV work, and that HMRC had already accepted that his other work was not subject to IR35 rules.

“Judge Heidi Poon drew considerably on the Court of Appeal decision in Atholl House, which was not appealed by HMRC.

“In my experience, HMRC are relying too heavily on the contract, and not considering the “circumstances” enough. We now have two decisions based on the same contract, that are different. Because of that, it is likely HMRC will try and appeal this decision. Whether they are granted permission though we wait and see.”

Qdos CEO, Seb Maley, commented:

“This is a big victory – not just for Stuart Barnes, but for freelancers, contractors and the businesses engaging these workers.

“It’s another reminder to risk-averse businesses that contractors can be engaged outside the scope of the IR35 legislation. This win could prove crucial in making it crystal clear to firms that forcing all contractors onto the payroll is unnecessary, not to mention expensive.

“That Barnes was deemed genuinely self-employed based on being in business ‘on his own account’ is important, too. There are many factors to consider when determining IR35 status – something that all parties must bear in mind.

“The less said about HMRC the better. As the creators and enforcers of the IR35 legislation, the tax office is ramping up its activity but still struggles to recognise compliance more than two decades after the introduction of these rules.”

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Zara Whysall: Presenteeism: Friend or Foe?

As a business psychologist straddling both academia and practice,...

The dreaded (or not so dreaded) Brexit: How leaving the EU will change employment law

For the first time in a generation there is a real possibility of the UK leaving the EU. With this in mind we consider the possible effect on employers in some key areas and a few "what if" scenarios.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you