HR pensions budgets to face triple whammy

-


HR budgets across the UK are at substantial risk and will affect employee pension schemes, warns Lorica Employee Benefits.

Over the next couple of years, two major legislation changes are set to be implemented as part of a consumer protection strategy and a government initiative aiming to restore consumer trust back into the market.

Tobin Murphy-Coles, commercial director of Lorica, explained:”Where HR directors used the old commission system to budget for an effective pensions and financial advice programme for employees, new rules under the Retail Distribution Review means that many HR directors will need to write a cheque for the service – or agree that it will be deducted from the employee’s fund. This will not be an easy transition or choice for many organisations, particularly with budgets squeezed as tight as they are.”

Changes to the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) implemented by the Financial Services Authority, aims to improve the clarity in how firms describe their services to consumers by increasing the professional standards of investment advisors and addressing the potential for advisor remuneration to distort consumer outcomes.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Under the changes, from 1st January 2013 commission used to pay financial advisors will no longer be used on new schemes and instead, companies will be expected to foot the bill, either directly or by deductions from pension scheme contributions.

Murphy-Coles said that the impact of the RDR is going to be wide-reaching: “The RDR will hit a HR director’s budget hard,” he said. “For many businesses, commission paid to advisors has allowed full engagement and advice to staff when it would have been far more difficult if it was funded by a fee paid by the employer.

He warns that such changes to RDR could exacerbate the old dynamic between HR directors and FDs who each have potentially conflicting priorities. The former must engage with employees and continue to be an employer of choice, whereas the latter must save costs and show ROI.

Previous research carried out by global leader in assurance, tax and advisor services, Ernst&Young, reveals that under the RDR, it will not be financially viable for banks to give advice to the mass Market. Ernst&Young predict that banks will have to charge at least £200 per hour for advice just to recover their costs.

“It’s a triple whammy for HR.” Murphy-Coles said. “In addition to dealing with legacy DB issues and cost, HR is also coping with the spectre of finding fees to provide education and advice to employees under the RDR changes, plus the additional funds to cope with the new auto-enrolment.”

Auto-enrolment, a further piece of legislation which comes into effect from October 2012, requires employers by law to enrol their staff into a pension scheme, making contributions on their behalf. The exact date each company will need to comply depends on the number of employed staff on 1st April 2012.

As pensions remain the highest costed benefit which businesses provide, this is likely to be exacerbated further as auto-enrolment and RDR changes kick in, requiring some businesses to find significantly more budget.

Murphy-Coles said: “Employees are going to be auto-enrolled at a contribution that will not be anything like the amount needed to meet their retirement aspirations. Their need for education and advice will be essential, yet under the changes, HR budgets will be really squeezed to foot the bill.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Andrew Harvey: HR & Comms, where’s the line?

Andrew Harvey discusses how HR can collaborate with its PR teams to ensure better communication with its employees and help to improve employee engagement within the company.

Helen Burgess: Sexual harassment at work

The recent allegations of harassment raised by the Williams’ former PA and house manager and claims that the army needs to do more to stamp it out have brought to the fore discussions on sexual harassment in the workplace.  So what are the implications for ’ordinary’ employers?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you