Female employees win equal pay case in Supreme Court

-

highcourt200The Supreme Court has today (26 June) issued its ruling in an equal pay case which could see a large number of council employees share a £12m compensation payout.

The local authority workers’ union, Unison, was pursuing the claim for Dumfries and Galloway Council female staff, including nursery nurses and support for learning and classroom assistants.

It argued their terms and conditions should be in line with male manual workers at their place of employment and the Supreme Court has today ruled in their favour and referred the case back to an Employment Tribunal.

The Tribunal must now decide whether the women’s work is of equal value to the male “comparators” and, if so, whether there is an explanation other than the difference in sex for the difference between their terms and conditions.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It was revealed that more than 200 equal pay claim cases were brought on behalf of the female staff and that they are seeking identical treatment as male manual workers. The men are currently employed under what is known as the ‘Green Book’, which includes provision for bonus payments and pay supplements, while the women’s contract is governed by the ‘Blue Book’, which has no such provision.

Initially, an Employment Tribunal allowed the claim to proceed, however an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) overturned that decision, ruling that there was no “real possibility” of the male workers doing their jobs in schools.

Although the Court of Session disagreed with that finding, it still dismissed the appeal on the grounds that if the men were to be employed in schools their terms and conditions would not be “broadly similar” to their existing terms.

Following this ruling, Unison decided to take the case to the Supreme Court, which today upheld its appeal.

Commenting on the ruling, Dave Prentis, Unison General Secretary, said:

“I am delighted that the Supreme Court has ruled in favour of our women members.

“It is a shame, though, that they have had to go through this process and endure a seven-year wait, just to get equal pay.

“Dumfries and Galloway Council should take immediate steps to correct their pay and I urge other councils to follow suit. We have nearly 2,000 cases on hold, waiting for this judgment.

“Employers should be in no doubt that this union will continue to pursue cases until all women are treated equally. There are far too many who are still discriminated against and far too many employers who are using every single legal argument and loophole to dodge their obligations under equal pay law.”

It has been reported that this case could see other councils forced to change their remuneration and bonus arrangements.

In a statement, Dumfries and Galloway Council said:

“This is a complex case, which has been considered by Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, Court of Session, and now the Supreme Court. The Employment Appeal Tribunal and Court of Session both ruled in our favour.

“The Supreme Court judgment is the most recent stage of the legal process. The appellants, including classroom assistants and nursery nurses, now have won the right to have their jobs compared to those of male manual workers, such as road workers and groundsmen.”

It added:

“This judgment has implications for many local authorities and other public bodies. Our council will now consider its position in response to the Supreme Court judgment.”

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

John Edmonds: Achieving ROI on training spend with good training delivery

Training budgets are often vulnerable when expenditure is being...

Case Study: Mediation in TfL – Resolving Disputes

In this article, Julia Mixter, Senior HR Business Partner in Transport for London, looks at the case for mediation, the process of introducing it in TfL and anticipates the issues that may arise. Including a list of Issues and Mitigation, and how they are dealt with in the TfL.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you