Over a third of new executives considering jumping ship

-

Thirty-nine per-cent of Senior Executives starting a new job find their first three months in the role so tough that they consider walking away from the organisation according to research by professional recruitment and executive search firm Harvey Nash.

The report ‘Onboard and upwards: How an executive’s first 90 days make or break the ones that follow’ was conducted among more than 280 executives changing jobs in the past year and suggests that executives are being poorly recruited and inducted into UK businesses.

One in five respondents feel they do not fit in well with the business once they have been hired due to inaccurate information about the role and organisation at the business stage and in terms of induction into new companies, only 24% stated they felt their induction was very useful.

Research also found that 73% plan to leave within three years and 37% plan to stay less than a year or are even already looking for new posts.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The findings also suggest that executives often lack a method of measuring their own performance and contribution once they have started a new job, with 46% admitting that their key performance indicators are not agreed within the first month, and 32% say they complete their first 90 days with goals still not set out.

Lucy McGee, Director of Leadership Services at Harvey Nash, commented on the findings:

“If you are investing in recruiting a senior employee, you would expect the rest of the management to be buying into that fresh perspective.

“Perhaps CEOs are better at expressing their vision of the future than they are taking on board new perspectives. But, respondents said they get a lot of time with the CEO at the beginning so it’s essential that they focus those conversations on what they expect from them.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Matt Stephens: How to support Gen-Z staff who are working remotely

"For Gen-Z, an incredibly digitally adept generation, remote working doesn’t have to be isolating, as long as their employers understand the right strategies to keep them engaged."

Jennifer Liston-Smith: How to address new concerns about early gender pay gap

New research has opened up concerns that the Gender Pay Gap comes into play straight after graduation. This brings fresh urgency to the work being done by the best HR teams.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you