Gen Z submitting twice as many job applications as older workers

-

Gen Z candidates are applying for an average of 24 positions before securing employment, twice the number submitted by Gen X (13) and Baby Boomers (11), according to new research from Totaljobs.

Half of Gen Z respondents (52%) believe their age leads to assumptions of being less reliable or loyal. As a result, 56 percent of younger applicants have considered accepting roles below their qualifications, while 46 percent have removed or adjusted age-related information on their CVs.

These challenges persist despite ongoing skills shortages in the UK, according to Totaljobs’ report, The Age Advantage: Overcoming Age Bias to Hire Experienced Talent. The report calls on organisations to address these biases and focus on harnessing the skills and potential of younger workers.

Impact of Age Bias on Young Job Seekers

Age-related discrimination is a significant barrier for Gen Z candidates. A third (34%) worry about their ability to secure a job due to being considered “too young,” and 44 percent report being explicitly rejected because of their age. This rejection rate is nearly double that experienced by older workers (24%), illustrating the disproportionate impact of age-related bias on young professionals.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In the recruitment process, 59 percent of HR decision-makers admitted to making assumptions about candidates based on age. Over half (51%) agreed that younger applicants are often dismissed due to a perceived lack of work ethic. Additionally, 47 percent of recruiters acknowledged considering age when assessing a candidate’s cultural fit within an organisation.

Natalie Matalon, Chief People Officer at Totaljobs (part of The Stepstone Group) said, “Younger workers are the future of any business. Ensuring they have opportunities to gain experience and develop their skills is critical for the workforce’s future. However, our research indicates that unconscious biases still prevent many businesses from fully accessing this vital talent pool.

“Businesses that embrace training and onboarding the fresh perspectives of younger workers will be better positioned to address talent shortages and nurture a skilled workforce for the future. While it’s promising that many employers already recognise the value of Gen Z, accelerating efforts to build more inclusive recruitment practices will unlock even more growth opportunities for both businesses and individuals.”

Barriers for Under-35s in the Workplace

For individuals aged 35 and under who have recently changed jobs or are currently seeking employment, age-related challenges extend beyond the hiring process. Almost half (46%) have faced inappropriate questions about their age during recruitment, while 58 percent feel workplace culture tends to favour more experienced employees.

These experiences contribute to hesitation among younger candidates, with 30 percent of under-35s admitting they are reluctant to apply for roles due to concerns about being perceived as too young.

Natalie Matalon added, “Businesses have the tools to tackle these biases and create more inclusive hiring processes. Whether it’s using AI to identify biased language in job ads, forming age-diverse hiring panels, or shifting from ‘cultural fit’ to ‘cultural add’ when assessing candidates, there are many positive and proactive steps businesses can implement to tackle this issue.

“The organisations that act now will not only gain access to a broader, more diverse talent pool, but also take an active part in developing workers’ essential skills and experience. Giving opportunities to younger workers also makes businesses more attractive, improving retention, creating a stronger long-term workplace.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Steve Arnold: How effective leave management can help future-proof productivity

Read the four tips to safeguard your workforce’s productivity for 2020 and beyond.

Rebecca Hughes: What happens when employees work remotely abroad without consent?

In an increasingly flexible world of work, the distinction between home and workplace has become blurred and can often present significant challenges for employers.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you