Google HR advised “mental health leave” for staff reporting sexist or racist behaviour

-

According to U.S-based employees of Google, the HR team would allegedly suggest staff take mental health leave when they issued complaints reporting sexist or racist behaviour in the workplace. 

Various former and current employees of Google have stated that HR would encourage employees to take medical leave and undergo mental health counselling when they issued complaints of misconduct in the workplace.

This would occur even when the complaints about workplace behaviour were not linked to mental health, employees have said.

Benjamin Cruz, a former employee, said that they had complained to HR about a comment made by a colleague which expressed “surprise” at Cruz “being darker than expected”.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, Cruz stated that, as a result of filing that complaint, the “work was pushed out” from under them. Cruz further went onto state that once medical leave was recommended, it “was like an automatic process”, leading them to get rejected from every subsequent role they applied for at the firm.

These allegations come after several high-profile cases of the company terminating employees who were closely linked to diversity and inclusion initiatives.

At the end of last year, Google allegedly fired Timnit Gebru, co-lead of its ethical AI research team. Ms. Gebru co-authored a research paper which outlined how language-generating artificial intelligence could lead to unknown dangerous biases.

The AI researcher accused Google of reviewing her work differently due to her racial identity, after refusing to retract her paper as requested. This ultimately led to the company firing her although Google disputes this, stating that Ms. Gebru offered her resignation which they then accepted.

This sentiment was also echoed by April Christina Curley, who worked as a diversity recruiter for the company, before being fired. Ms. Curley stated that her willingness to call out recruitment practises such as “screening out” CVs of students with ‘unfamiliar’ school or university names led to her receiving “active abuse and retaliation” from several managers.

Both women stated that they were encouraged to take mental health leave or utilise “therapy resources” in response to the issues they raised.

However, a spokesperson for Google defended the company:

We have a well-defined process for how employees can raise concerns and we work to be extremely transparent about how we handle complaints.

All concerns reported to us are investigated rigorously, and we take firm action against employees who violate our policies.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Robert McCreath: Internships – No longer in Vogue?

Condé Nast discontinues intern program. Do you hear that?...

Alan Price: Are job-hopping employees bad for business?

With a buoyant job market, job-hopping has never been easier in some sectors. So what is job-hopping and is it something employers should be worried about? Alan Price investigates.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you