Google HR advised “mental health leave” for staff reporting sexist or racist behaviour

-

According to U.S-based employees of Google, the HR team would allegedly suggest staff take mental health leave when they issued complaints reporting sexist or racist behaviour in the workplace. 

Various former and current employees of Google have stated that HR would encourage employees to take medical leave and undergo mental health counselling when they issued complaints of misconduct in the workplace.

This would occur even when the complaints about workplace behaviour were not linked to mental health, employees have said.

Benjamin Cruz, a former employee, said that they had complained to HR about a comment made by a colleague which expressed “surprise” at Cruz “being darker than expected”.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, Cruz stated that, as a result of filing that complaint, the “work was pushed out” from under them. Cruz further went onto state that once medical leave was recommended, it “was like an automatic process”, leading them to get rejected from every subsequent role they applied for at the firm.

These allegations come after several high-profile cases of the company terminating employees who were closely linked to diversity and inclusion initiatives.

At the end of last year, Google allegedly fired Timnit Gebru, co-lead of its ethical AI research team. Ms. Gebru co-authored a research paper which outlined how language-generating artificial intelligence could lead to unknown dangerous biases.

The AI researcher accused Google of reviewing her work differently due to her racial identity, after refusing to retract her paper as requested. This ultimately led to the company firing her although Google disputes this, stating that Ms. Gebru offered her resignation which they then accepted.

This sentiment was also echoed by April Christina Curley, who worked as a diversity recruiter for the company, before being fired. Ms. Curley stated that her willingness to call out recruitment practises such as “screening out” CVs of students with ‘unfamiliar’ school or university names led to her receiving “active abuse and retaliation” from several managers.

Both women stated that they were encouraged to take mental health leave or utilise “therapy resources” in response to the issues they raised.

However, a spokesperson for Google defended the company:

We have a well-defined process for how employees can raise concerns and we work to be extremely transparent about how we handle complaints.

All concerns reported to us are investigated rigorously, and we take firm action against employees who violate our policies.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Vacancies fall to lowest level in five years as employers delay recruitment

UK vacancies have fallen to their lowest level in five years as employers delay permanent hiring and more workers compete for fewer roles.
- Advertisement -

NHS badge review raises wider questions about political expression at work

A government-backed NHS review has reignited debate over political symbols at work and how employers can balance protected beliefs with workplace conduct.

Andrew Fettes-Brown: Leading with curiosity – why the built environment needs a culture shift to allow for innovation

Curiosity creates the conditions for learning, growth and understanding. It encourages us to interrogate problems properly rather than rushing to solutions.

Must read

Dr Mark Winwood: Some employees will lie when they’re sick – but it’s not all dishonest

The first Monday of February has come to be known as ‘National Sickie Day’ – the day that employees are supposed to be most likely to call in sick. Employment law firm ELAS, which has promoted the notion, maintains that a combination of miserable weather, commuting in the dark, post-Christmas credit card bills and long gap between holidays makes the first Monday of February the day that people are most likely to take some unofficial time off.

Mark Eltringham: The greatest challenge for the modern workplace is how to engineer serendipity

It’s not often that workplace management becomes national news...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you