One in four UK workers fear losing their jobs to AI

-

A YouGov poll commissioned by workplace expert Acas explored employees’ main concerns about the use of AI at work. It found that 26 percent of workers fear that AI could cost them their jobs. Just under a fifth, at 17 percent, said they were concerned about AI making errors, while 15 percent cited a lack of regulation as a major worry.

Dan Ellis, Interim Chief Executive of Acas, pointed out the need for employers to address these concerns when introducing AI technologies. He said, “Some employers may be looking to embrace new technologies as a way to cut costs, increase productivity or make workers’ jobs easier.

“There can be concerns from staff when new technologies are introduced at work and it’s clear from our study that their biggest worry is that AI will result in job losses. Bosses should have clear policies on the use of AI at work, remember that it is not a perfect technology and have open conversations with employees around its use.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Clear AI policies and employee consultation

Acas advises that organisations adopting AI should develop clear and transparent policies around its use in the workplace. Consulting employees and any representatives about its introduction is recommended, particularly if AI is expected to change how certain roles operate. Changes to responsibilities involving AI could result in the need to amend terms and conditions of employment.

Employers are encouraged to present AI as a tool for enhancing employees’ roles rather than replacing them. Providing reassurance that human skills will still be necessary can help ease fears about job security; training may also be required to ensure that staff understand how to use AI effectively and get the best results from it.

Acas also points out that AI technology is not without flaws. Outputs generated by AI should be checked carefully for accuracy, tone and bias. Any AI-generated material should be clearly cited to maintain transparency in communications and decision-making.

The privacy problem

Organisations must ensure that their data privacy policies extend to the use of AI. Employees should be cautious when entering business-sensitive or personal information into AI platforms, particularly public tools. There is a risk that such information could be made public or used by others if adequate precautions are not taken.

The guidance notes the importance of aligning AI use with existing data protection regulations, including compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Acas advises checking with internal IT teams to ensure that only approved platforms are being used for work-related AI activities.

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Ben Black: What Are The True Benefits of Being a Family-Friendly Employer?

So what are the true benefits of being a...

Iain McMath: The clock is ticking

Childcare vouchers are a long-established government-led employee benefit for...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you