Supreme Court judgment overturns decision in deafness appeal

-

In the case of Baker v Quantum Clothing Group, the Supreme Court has today overturned a Court of Appeal judgment which held employers liable for hearing loss caused by noise above 85 decibels from 1978 onwards. Paul Coppin, partner at international law firm Eversheds comments:

“Today’s decision handed down by the Supreme Court restores common sense to the assessment of liability in hearing loss claims arising in respect of exposure to noise before January 1990. This decision is also important for employers and their insurers as it overturns the retrospective interpretation of s29 of the Factories Act 1961 in relation to keeping workplaces ‘safe’.

Click image for further training information
“The Supreme Court decision confirms that there is no such thing as an unchanging concept of safety. Instead it is a relative concept in which foreseeability plays a part in the assessment as to whether the workplace was safe. Therefore safety is to be judged according to general knowledge and standards at the time of the alleged breach of duty. This applies to both the assessment as to whether the workplace is safe and as to whether the defendant has complied with the duty ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’.

“Employers and their insurers will be reassured by the Supreme Court’s ruling that the 1961 Act was not intended to impose a liability that was more stringent than the common law. The Court of Appeal decision imposed modern day standards upon employers retrospectively for historic exposure and this has now been overruled by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court judgment brings employers back full circle to the position that existed before the Court of Appeal ruling in May 2009.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Kiran Kapur: the real cost of apprenticeships

Apprenticeships of all types have shown an increase in popularity in recent times, and the reasons are not hard to spot.

Nicola Smith – Recruiting resolutions

I’m already groaning at the resolutions I’m programmed to...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you