HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Firm fined after ignoring safety instructions

-

A Battersea laundry firm has been fined after ignoring instructions to make it easier and safer for workers to move heavy loads.

Niva UK (Ltd), trading as Sunbeam Laundry, failed to act on two separate Improvement Notices served by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) following a routine inspection of its premises at the London Stone Business Estate on the 6 May 2010.

The first Improvement Notice required the removal of bags of laundry and other items from walkways, including a stairway, and the entrance to a female staff toilet. The second required an urgent review and improvements to reduce the lifting and handling of laundry.

City of London Magistrates’ Court heard that when HSE made a return inspection two months later, Niva had done nothing to comply with either notice. Employees were still carrying heavy loads through blocked walkways and were routinely risking tripping and falling as a result.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

After the hearing HSE Inspector Clare Hawkes said:

“The law requires employers to provide walkways that are clear of obstructions so employees can move around freely and safely without risking injury from trips and falls.

“Also where employees are at risk of injuring themselves from handling heavy and cumbersome loads, and from awkward postures, the employer must take action to reduce those risks. Yet Niva UK Ltd turned a blind eye to both of these requirements.

“HSE will continue to take action against companies who shirk their responsibilities in this way. Employers who do not comply with enforcement notices are very likely to find themselves in court, as was shown today.”

The company pleaded guilty to two separate breaches of Section 33 (1)(g) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 for failing to take action and was fined £2,000 and ordered to pay £5,062 in costs.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Brian Kropp: Iceland four-day week trial should inspire a fundamental change in business philosophy

"As we emerge from the pandemic, businesses have a unique opportunity to discover new ways of working that can drive increased employee health and engagement in the future".

Nick Le Riche and Kevin Poulter: Exclusivity Clauses in Zero Hour Contracts Banned

Various employment provisions of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015  came into force last month, including a ban on exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts.  Zero hours contracts were one of the hot topics during the recent General Election campaign and how will the new provisions affect employers’ use of workers on this type of contract.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you