Boxing Day tube strike challenged at High Court

-

London Underground (LU) has commenced legal action challenging the validity of the strike called by the Aslef union in a row over additional Boxing Day pay.

Aslef is calling for “substantial incentives”, thought to be treble pay, and a day off in lieu for those that work on Boxing Day. If the dispute is not resolved, the union intends to take further action on 16 January and 3 and 13 February.

The crux of LU’s legal action to block the strike is that, despite only a quarter of LU’s 3,500 drivers being scheduled to work on 26 December, Aslef has balloted all 2,200 of its members for strike action.

Howard Collins, LU’s Chief Operating Officer, said: “This threat of strike action is disgraceful, and Londoners will share our disbelief at these outrageous claims by Aslef’s leadership for even more money to work on a day for which their members are already being paid.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“LU has a long-standing agreement with all of its trade unions which covers working arrangements on public holidays, and Boxing Day is included in that.

“The Underground is a public service that should be playing its part in helping Londoners and the Capital have a happy and prosperous Christmas, and we will take every possible step to ensure that happens.”

An ASLEF spokesperson said the union was not surprised at the legal challenge, but it was disappointed.

They commented: “I am sure Londoners would prefer LU to be sitting down with the union hammering out a solution to this dispute rather than wasting time briefing solicitors and wasting money by pouring it into the pockets of barristers.

“We don’t expect the legal challenge to be successful and all it will do is increase ill-feeling which will make an agreement more difficult to secure.

“Legal action at this time is no more than a distraction.”

A High Court decision is expected today.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Eduardo García Garzón: AI should enhance the human touch – not replace it

With over half of UK businesses investing in AI-powered HR, how can employees trust HR with sensitive issues if they’re only able to interact with bots?

Jon Ingham: Don’t blame the Ulrich model

I’m looking forward to chairing Symposium Event’s Successful HR Business...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you