Employee dismissed for comments he made on Facebook

-

David Smith, a canal worker from Scotland, has brought a claim for unfair dismissal in the Employment Tribunal after he was dismissed for posting comments on his Facebook page. 

He commented on Facebook that he was “on standby, so only going to get half p***ed lol”. He also commented that he was “drinking vodka and apple juice”.

In another post, Mr Smith commented: “Why are gaffers such p****s? Is there a book teaching them to be total w*****s? Need a new job”.

Mr Smith has told an Employment Tribunal that his comments were “banter”, and a “joke”. He also claimed that he thought his Facebook page was private.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In his defence, Mr Smith has claimed that he was being bullied by his supervisors, and was about to raise a grievance against them. It was at this point when the comments, which had been made on Facebook two years earlier, were sent to Human Resources. 

He believes they were brought up to prevent him making his grievance, which also related to health and safety issues.

Mr Smith told the tribunal he believed his Facebook page was set to private and would never have made the comments if he knew they would be in the public domain.

The company, Scottish Canals, dismissed Mr Smith on the grounds that he had been drinking alcohol while he was on standby, and potentially putting people at risk, as well as making highly offensive comments, and bringing the company into disrepute.  

It seems suspicious that the comments had been made on Facebook two years before they came to Mr Smith’s employer’s attention, and it was just at the time when Mr Smith was intending to raise a grievance against his supervisors. The Tribunal may be of the opinion that the company was looking for a reason to dismiss Mr Smith, and this is how they chose to do it.

However, based on the comments that Mr Smith placed on Facebook, it is likely that the Tribunal would find that Mr Smith’s dismissal was a fair one. He made derogatory comments about his employer, and provided evidence that he was drinking alcohol while on duty. These could both be considered to be gross misconduct.

Employers should make sure that they have a very stringent and clear social media policy, and should also make sure that all employees are aware of the policy. In addition, it may be worth providing training on the use of social media in the workplace to employees so that there can be no confusion.

Employees should consider this: Facebook is a public forum, whether or not you believe that your page is private. Posting to Facebook is equivalent to putting a comment on the staffroom notice board. If you would not make a comment on the staffroom notice board, then you should not make such a comment on Facebook. You would risk being in breach of your employer’s social media policy, and could be dismissed.

If an employee claims that a certain comment is “banter” or a “joke”, this does not mean that it could not potentially offend somebody, or even amount to discrimination. It is better to be safe than sorry, and if in doubt, do not say (or post) it. 

Article by Anthony Fox, who is a member of the employment law team at Michael Lewin Solicitors 

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Leah Edwards: The new laws set to have a big impact on HR leaders in 2024

"These laws have all been passed this year and we’re expecting them to come into force across 2024."

Nicholas Roi: Engaging a geographically dispersed workforce

As remote working is on the rise, more businesses...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you