Eugene Burke: Are you building your competitors’ talent pipeline?

-

shutterstock_148121969

Recent media coverage of the Debenhams CFO stepping down due to poor profit performance has prompted many investors to question whether the right leadership is in place in their organisations. Our research shows that organisations with stronger leadership gain double the revenue and profit growth than those with weaker leadership. This highlights the importance of effective leadership and underlines the need to develop talent programmes that identify and nurture top talent as the UK is poised for economic recovery.

Savvy business leaders are realising the value of investing in top talent, but this throws up several challenges. Why should investment be made in high-potential programmes and what is the probable ROI? How do they identify the organisation’s high-potential individuals? And more importantly, how do they know these high flyers will stay with the business for years to come?

High-potential: the value and reality

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

According to our recent whitepaper ‘Improving the Odds of Success for High-Potential Programmes’, high-potential employees are seen as almost twice as valuable to their organisations as employees who are not high-potential. A whopping 5 in 6 HR managers state they are dissatisfied with the results these programmes deliver; 50% of individuals identified as high-potential drop out of their programme within five years and just 1 in 6 employees entering a high-potential programme will succeed in a senior role. This reality shows that high-potential programmes are failing to deliver. This investment is at best wasted and, at worst, feeding competitors’ talent pipeline with the most valuable people.

Assumptions lead to the wrong investment 

The reason for such a low success rate is that organisations fail to define exactly what a high-potential employee is and define what they are high-potential for. One of the most common errors in high-potential programme design is to assume that the organisation’s employees who are performing well today are also its high-potential employees for tomorrow.

Secondly, organisations are continuing to put forward the wrong people, investing in those who do not have the aspiration, ability and engagement to succeed in a senior role. This misidentification of talent is preventing those with the strongest potential from reaching the top, where their talents are most critical to the organisation’s future, impacting productivity, innovation and performance.

Changing the odds of success of high-potential programmes

With the C-suite placing increased pressure on the HR department to prove the value of any talent investment made, using a best-practice framework will allow them to have a deeper understanding of the motivations, qualities and capabilities needed for future generations of leaders.

Interestingly, only a third of organisations are using valid assessment methods to identify high-potential talent and almost half lack any systematic process for identifying and developing these candidates. This represents a missed opportunity and a clearer framework is needed for identifying true leaders.

By using objective data and re-thinking high-potential programmes, the success of these initiatives can be improved by a factor of 11. Organisations need to collect data which indicates whether an employee will rise to a senior position, whether they will be effective when they get there and if they will still be with the organisation when they reach this level.

Securing engagement and the potential to stay

Less than half of high-potentials intend to stay with their employer but if engaged, they’re much more likely to rise to new positions, and realise their potential. High-potentials value recognition – but most organisations don’t even tell these individuals that they’re high-potential. While there may be cultural or other reasons to keep the high-potentials lists confidential, not informing these candidates and celebrating their accomplishments is a lost opportunity to improve satisfaction and engagement.

Doubling up on success

Overall, it is more cost-effective in the long run to develop a high-potential employee than have a person underperforming in a senior role or flees the company. If the wrong candidate reaps the benefit of the high-potential programme and then leaves the organisation to a rival firm, then your business is at risk of developing your competitors’ talent pipeline.

Companies have the opportunity to double revenue and profit if they re-engineer their high-potential programmes. Reap the rewards of a fruitful talent pipeline to capitalise on future growth and new markets. High-potentials are an organisation’s future leaders, and strong leadership is fundamental to a business’ growth and productivity.

Eugene Burke, chief science and analytics officer, CEB

Latest news

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.
- Advertisement -

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Must read

Adam Nuckley: Don’t shoot the gender pay messenger

Is compulsory gender pay reporting really - as King’s College economics professor, Baroness Wolf, described - just “gesture politics” which “will do nothing whatsoever about the things that are really a problem for poorly paid women and which have nothing to do with widespread overt pay discrimination, for which there is no evidence at all any more anyway?”

Jeremy Snape: Relentless or Resilient?

Today’s working week hardly leaves a moment for rest. Long hours at the office and little rest have become a part of most managers’ careers. Some feel forced into this cycle, while others take pride in how long they spend working and their constant availability to clients.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you