Erika Bannerman: Staff satisfaction isn’t enough to maintain a stable workforce

-

talentAfter years of stagnation, businesses are now focusing on growth. For employers, stability in their workforce is essential so they can focus on other parts of their business. HR strategies aiming to satisfy staff are essential; however it’s worth knowing that staff satisfaction is not always enough to keep workers within the business in the long-term.

In fact, according to a survey of over 1,000 London workers conducted as part of Brook Street’s Survive & Thrive campaign (www.surviveandthrive.co.uk), over half of workers (58%) said that they were satisfied in their current jobs. This sounds positive but, less than 40% of workers said they see themselves with the same company in twelve months’ time. This highlights that keeping staff happy is important, but employers also need to ensure they spend time thinking about what is going to make their talent want to stay within the business.

Making sure that HR directors know what their staff really wants is extremely important. Without it, HR strategies are not fully informed and can’t reflect the real needs of workers. Employers also need to be aware of what their competitors are offering, and what could lure their staff out of the door. The Brook Street survey found that 63% of workers would leave their current role for a better offer elsewhere, rather than a lack of opportunity or dissatisfaction in their current role. If HR professionals remain conscious of the threat of competitors snatching their talent, they have a much better chance at keeping staff in place.

Another interesting fact that has come out of our survey is the impact that staff departures have on existing staff. The survey found that 42% of employees would be more inclined to look for a new job if their colleague had done so. This is worth bearing in mind as there is a risk that employers may find themselves in the difficult position of replacing more than one member of staff at a time, which can be challenging and place additional pressure on the rest of the workforce.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The loss of staff can also leave a significant skills gap. A separate survey conducted by Brook Street for the 2013 London Salary Guide, found that it can take over two months to replace a member of staff. Workers have recognised that their skills are crucial to the performance of businesses and are becoming increasingly selective about the roles that they will consider.  Employers really need to take all of these facts into consideration if they want to be successful at retaining their talent and not put their productivity at risk.

We are starting to see a renewed ‘war for talent’ with employees being exposed to a range of job temptations. In fact, nearly half of the workers surveyed for our Survive and Thrive campaign said that they receive regular job alerts via jobs boards and social networking sites, even though they are already employed. Alongside this, 28% of workers said that they have been approached by head-hunters or other businesses in the past year. It’s more important than ever that employers open up their eyes to the realities of the jobs market before they find themselves losing key members of staff.

Skills shortages are an ever impending threat on the success of businesses. The easiest way to plug the talent gap is by going to competitors, so businesses need to think about how they can protect their workforce and ensure that employees aren’t tempted by packages and programmes that your business could easily implement itself. With the risk of multiple staff leaving in quick succession, it is essential that employers reconsider their retention process as often as they can, allowing them to understand the needs of staff. As long as businesses keep this on the top of their agenda, staff morale is likely to be higher and the threat of staff churn can be diminished.

About Erika Bannerman

Erika Bannerman is Sales and Marketing director at Brook Street, the recruitment specialists. With over 20 years’ industry experience, Erika deals with a number of organisations from SMEs to FTSE 100s to provide in-depth recruitment and strategic solutions advice.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Paul Russell: So you want to be…influential?

When dealing with the complexities of myriad personalities from ground to board level, attempting to implement strategy and policies, championing initiatives, managing conflict and motivating employees, influence is surely the crème de la crème of skills; if people are HR’s resource then influence is the resource of HR’s. But achieving influence is a delicate tightrope walk of precision and accuracy, lean too much one way and you veer to coercion and manipulation, veer to the opposite side and weakness and inefficiency await.

Hannah Robbins: To what extent are your off the record discussions with employees protected?

Off the record discussions or protected conversations have played a significant role in employer-employee exit negotiations since they became inadmissible in unfair dismissal proceedings on the 29th July 2013, but not every conversation is automatically protected. To what extent can employers genuinely have an off the record discussion?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you