Maxine Carrington on who AI really serves at work

-

“Are we working for AI at this point or is AI working for us?”

Context

The rapid rollout of artificial intelligence tools across workplaces is prompting new questions about control, productivity and employee experience, as organisations integrate automation into everyday tasks.

Maxine Carrington, chief people officer at Northwell Health, a US-based healthcare provider and one of the largest employers in New York State, raised the issue during a recent discussion in New York among HR leaders on the future of AI at work. Her comment came as organisations continue to invest heavily in automation while trying to define the role of employees alongside it.

Meaning

The question reflects growing unease about how AI is being deployed in practice. While technology is often introduced as a tool to support workers, there are concerns that poorly implemented systems can instead dictate how work is carried out.

Carrington’s remark suggests a need to reassess that balance. Rather than employees adapting entirely to systems, organisations may need to ensure that AI is designed to enhance human work, not control it.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Implications

The issue raises important considerations for HR leaders overseeing AI adoption. Decisions about how tools are implemented, monitored and evaluated will shape whether employees feel empowered or constrained.

If organisations fail to maintain that balance, experts say there is a risk of reduced engagement and trust. But where AI is introduced with clear purpose and human oversight, it has the potential to support productivity while improving the day-to-day experience of work.

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Oracle plans up to 30,000 job cuts as AI spending drives tech layoffs surge

Large-scale layoffs across tech and banking signal growing impact of artificial intelligence investment on global jobs

Exclusive: London bus drivers’ ‘dignity’ at risk as strikes loom over welfare concerns

London bus drivers raise concerns over fatigue and lack of facilities as potential strikes escalate long-standing welfare issues.

Whistleblowing reports ‘surge by up to 250 percent’ at councils as new rights take effect

Whistleblowing cases are rising across UK councils as stronger workplace protections come into force, though concerns remain about underreporting of serious issues.

Bullying and harassment to become regulatory breaches under new FCA rules

New rules will bring bullying and harassment into regulatory scope, as firms face rising reports of workplace misconduct.
- Advertisement -

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

Must read

Helena Parry: Are we addressing the real diversity challenge?

The debate around women in the boardroom has continued...

Chris Holme: Knowing the chain – how to deal with the modern slavery statement

As of last Friday new government legislation came into force requiring companies with a turnover of £36 million or more to produce a ‘slavery and human trafficking statement’ at the end of each financial year.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you