Mike Anderson on Why AI Agents Should Be Seen as Colleagues

-

“What we’re trying to help people understand is that [an AI agent] is a co-worker that’s going to help you be more productive, not someone who’s going to replace you.”

Context

The remark comes from Mike Anderson, chief digital and information officer at cloud security company Netskope, in a Wall Street Journal report examining how corporate technology and human resources teams are jointly preparing staff for AI-driven change in the workplace.

The report describes how organisations are reshaping processes and structures in response to what executives see as a long-term shift in how work is carried out. Netskope has been working to change employee perceptions of AI, with Anderson and chief people officer Patsy Gilmore collaborating to show staff that digital agents are tools meant to support, not supplant, their roles.

Across businesses, the article notes that concerns about job losses and new digital co-workers are prompting closer alignment between IT and HR as both groups guide employees through unfamiliar territory.

Meaning

Anderson’s statement conveys that AI agents are intended to function as supportive colleagues rather than rivals. By depicting them as co-workers, he signalled that staff should see the technology as part of day-to-day collaboration rather than a threat to their jobs.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The framing reflects a wider shift in how businesses are approaching AI adoption. Rather than focusing solely on automation, leaders are seeking to maintain trust and reduce anxiety by emphasising shared workflows and the need for employees to learn, experiment and adapt.

It also points to an emerging culture in which people and AI tools work together in service of productivity and problem-solving.

Implications

The comment reinforces the growing expectation that HR teams will take an active role in shaping employees’ understanding of AI and its place within organisational life. Training programmes, clear communication and manager support will be essential if staff are to work confidently with digital agents.

Companies may need to rethink job design, career paths and performance measures as AI takes on more routine tasks. Ensuring that employees have time to become comfortable with new tools, and that learning and development teams are equipped to deliver relevant upskilling, will be central to successful adoption.

The message also carries a warning. Without thoughtful implementation and open discussion, AI risks fuelling uncertainty and disengagement. When staff feel excluded from decisions about technology, perceptions of replacement can harden, even when the intention is augmentation.

Anderson’s line is ultimately a reminder that the future of work depends as much on communication and culture as on coding. HR and technology leaders who treat AI agents as partners in human productivity, and help employees to do the same, will be better placed to build workplaces where confidence, capability and collaboration grow together.

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Derek Miles: Why it’s time for a workplace pensions revolution

Emerging from Osborne’s somewhat underwhelming Autumn Statement last month,...

Nicola Smith: A permanent talent crisis

Everyone knows HR people love a good workshop. And...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you