Elouisa Crichton: AI hiring tools – what recruiters need to know about discrimination risks

-

For UK employers, this shift brings opportunities but also significant legal risks, as biases within AI hiring systems may leave employers exposed to discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010.

Qualitative findings from a 2025 Melbourne University study revealed that 13 AI hiring systems available on the global market (albeit tested solely in Australia) discriminated against applicants who wear religious coverings, request workplace accommodations for disabilities, or have names that the AI system perceived to be black.

Additionally, candidates whose first language isn’t English or who have speech conditions often score poorly in AI-powered interviews due to inaccurate transcription.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Other studies concur with these findings. A 2023 paper by the Nanjing College of Economics and Management found that algorithmic bias resulted in discriminatory hiring practices based on gender, race, colour, and personality traits. These studies underpin the reality that it is difficult for data used to train AI to be neutral and consequently that biases can be baked into systems without the knowledge of developers.

So, while AI can help save time when recruiting, companies must be aware of the risks these systems present for hiring processes.

Preventing discrimination

To ensure AI-supported recruitment is conducted fairly, businesses must routinely inspect their AI training programmes.

This can be achieved through accountability and scrutiny of AI processes. Regular audits of AI systems can identify patterns of bias or unfair candidate treatment. The University of Melbourne’s 2025 study identified that employers “need a better understanding of the [AI hiring systems] rolled out in their organisations and their potential to cause harm at scale”.

Analysis of implementation and results will help deepen understanding of these tools. Noting and reporting any identified patterns of potential discrimination allows data scientists to adjust and implement diverse training data.

Establishing clear AI governance via a committee or board with usage policies, particularly for hiring new staff, with designated responsibility for human oversight of systems’ decision-making, is a step in the right direction towards countering the potential biases of AI tools.

Transparency is also crucial for fostering candidate trust. Being open about AI use to candidates and disclosing how information, including personal data will be processed is a necessary measure to comply with data protection obligations, but it can also help reassure candidates about the nature of the process they have signed up for.

Ensuring an organisation’s internal teams understand the new technology is also vital. HR teams and hiring managers using AI tools must recognise the capabilities and limits of their software, especially due to the large risk of potential discrimination in recruitment and be clear about their role as overseers of the tools’ implementation.

Training to use AI in recruitment

Specific training for AI-powered recruitment is critical in helping employees understand how to use the technology while also avoiding potential discriminatory actions. This can be via critiquing data sets more proficiently or interrogating the AI on its candidate selection.

User-friendly tools which require little-to-no coding knowledge are ideal for widespread use within an organisation for the purposes of recruitment.

Making staff comfortable in using AI to assist in recruitment can help reduce the risk of perverse decisions and maximise its successful use. As AI becomes increasingly embedded in the market, understanding risks and opportunities isn’t just advisable, it’s essential for business survival and growth.

Implementing AI will allow for far greater efficiency from staff – but it must be handled with care due to the potential discriminatory nature of these systems.

Partner at  | Website

Elouisa is partner within Dentons' People Reward and Mobility practice in Glasgow. She is an expert in employment and equality law and works on Scottish, UK and international matters.

She is accredited by the Law Society of Scotland as a specialist in both employment and discrimination law. Chambers and Partners ranks her as the Employment Star Associate 2024. Legal 500 chose her as the Employment Rising Star of the Year 2023, and has ranked her as Rising Star in 2022, 2023 and 2024.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Julie Downing: Bringing the HR department out of the shadows

All too often the HR department is viewed simply as a team of firefighters, just called upon to defuse a crisis and then retreating to the shadows of the supportive “back office”. Businesses are quickly realising why this is unsustainable.

Interview: Olivia Hill of AAT talks about the gender pay gap and the best ways to close it

Olivia Hill was appointed to the role at ATT (the Association of Accounting Technicians) of Chief HR Officer in November 2014 at ATT. She has worked at the company since 2008 and is responsible for reward and benefits strategy, training and development, employee engagement and recruitment and retention. HRReview spoke to her about the gender pay gap and the recent government attempts to solve the problem.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you