Code finally published on pension incentive exercises

-

In recent years, due to the rising costs commonly associated with running a defined benefit pension scheme, employers have taken various steps to attempt to reduce those costs. One way in which they have done this is by the use of incentive exercises in which members are given inducements to transfer out or give up certain benefits in exchange for an alternative benefit. The most common methods have been so called enhanced transfer value exercises where members are offered an incentive to transfer their benefits out of a defined benefit scheme into an alternative pension arrangement and pension increase exchange exercises where members are given an incentive in exchange for giving up an entitlement to future non statutory pension increases.

Concern has been expressed by certain sections of the pensions industry that such exercises can have a detrimental effect on members because whilst such incentive offers may be initially ostensibly attractive to members, m may actually be giving up generous defined benefit pension benefits in exchange for what will amount to a less generous pension in the future. In particular, Steve Webb MP, the pensions minister, has been highly critical of such exercises and his concerns led to the setting up of a pension industry wide group to draw up a code of practice for incentive exercises. The minister had floated the idea of legislating to regulate incentive exercises but decided against this (for the time being at least).

The Incentivised Transfers Working Group has now published its code of practice which applies with immediate effect to incentive offers first made on or after 8 June 2012. Incentive exercises which were underway prior to this date are not expressly covered by the code but it states that employers who are running an incentive exercise which began prior to this date should have regard to the code in their dealings with members (according to the stage that their incentive exercise is at). Whilst the code is not strictly legally binding, it sets out the best practice approach to be taken when conducting an incentive exercise and therefore should be followed by employers and trustees whose schemes are carrying out such an exercise.

The code sets out seven principles which apply to incentive exercises and those principles are summarised below:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

  • The code states that members should not be offered cash payments which are contingent upon members accepting the offer. However, members can be given offers to encourage them to engage in the incentive exercise process provided that it is made clear to members that they aren’t under any pressure to accept the offer.
  • The code recommends that independent financial advice is made available to members from a suitably qualified financial adviser.
  • Communications to members should be fair, clear, unbiased and straightforward. Members should be clearly told they are under no obligation to accept the offer and warned of the risks if they do accept it (namely that they may be giving up generous pension benefits in exchange for benefits which may not be commensurate in value to those benefits which are given up).
  • The parties to an incentive exercise should keep adequate records of incentive offers which have been made to members, together with a copy of those members’ responses.
  • Members should be given sufficient time to decide whether to accept an offer and should not be placed under undue pressure. A two week cooling off period is recommended after members have returned option forms indicating their decision as to the incentive offer.
  • Members aged 80 or above should only be included in an incentive exercise on an opt-in basis (i.e. told that the exercise is underway and asked to get in touch with the employer or scheme if they wish to participate in it). Specific procedures should be put in place for any vulnerable members participating in the exercise.
  • All parties involved in an incentive exercise should know their roles and act in good faith.

It waits to be seen how effective the code will be in assuaging the concerns of those people who have been critical of incentive exercises. The threat that the government will legislate to regulate (or even prohibit) incentive exercises remains which means that this is very much a watch this space area.

Latest news

Iran conflict and rising costs push UK job vacancies to five-year low

Falling vacancies and weaker payroll numbers are adding to concerns that economic uncertainty and rising business costs are cooling recruitment activity.

Public fears AI job losses as entry-level roles come under pressure

Most workers fear artificial intelligence will destroy jobs and damage opportunities for young people as businesses accelerate AI adoption.

Government launches major overhaul of mental health care with focus on prevention

Ministers have launched plans for a major overhaul of mental health care with greater focus on prevention, workplaces and early intervention.

Employers prioritise cost control over growth as confidence remains weak, CIPD says

Rising labour, energy and operating expenses are keeping employers cautious on hiring, pay and investment despite a modest rise in recruitment intentions.
- Advertisement -

Ciara Harrington: Why an AI strategy without skills visibility is just guesswork

Organisations are racing to adopt AI, but does the workforce actually have the skills to use it in meaningful, productive ways?

Maureen Kyne on hidden problems in workplace reporting

“Upward bullying is frequently buried within aggregated HR reporting, labelled as ‘conflict’ or ‘personality clashes’, masking its true impact and preventing meaningful oversight.”

Must read

Lyn Roseaman: How to end your speech with impact

The end of your speech is arguably even more important than the opening. Conclusions are the speaker’s opportunity to influence what their audience remembers about you and your business. It also reaffirms your authority as someone worth hearing. So, how can you end your speech with a bang, not a whimper?

Arusha Gupta: How does a merger or acquisition impact company culture?

When two companies merge or when one acquires another, it is not just a matter of combining operations, customers, and resources...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you