HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

8 in 10 UK workers more likely to choose an employer that offers continuous learning and development

-

As a new independent Docebo survey reveals today, more than eight in 10 (83%) UK employees would be more likely to choose to work for an employer that prioritises continuous learning and development opportunities.

Also, two-thirds (66%) said that they would consider changing jobs within 12 months if their current employer cut (or did not offer) learning opportunities or training to help with their career development.

Overall, when asked for the top three reasons why they would quit a job or have quit a job in the past, UK workers cited not being paid enough (75%), poor management (49%), and the under-resourcing of teams (34%) as the top factors.

Talent shortages

Whilst pay is paramount, managers lacking the right skill set to lead and talent shortages leading to under-staffing are putting pressure on teams and sparking further employee churn.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Elsewhere, almost a third (30%) of UK employees cited ‘poor culture’ as a reason they would or had quit and over a quarter (28%) cited ‘limited opportunities to climb the career ladder’. Implementing a culture of continuous learning and investing in staff development could be a significant way to reduce staff turnover when increasing pay is not an option.

Although scoring highly across all age groups, millennials appear to care the most about choosing the right employer with L&D in mind, with eight in 10 (83%) saying they would be more likely to choose an employer that prioritised continuous learning and development opportunities, compared to 79 percent of Gen Z.

Interestingly, the less experienced an employee is, the more they would feel compelled to quit their job if their employer cut L&D. Two-thirds of Gen Z (66%) and 65 percent of millennial respondents said they would consider quitting, compared to only 55 percent of baby boomer employees.

Mike Byrne, Vice President of Sales EMEA at Docebo, says:

“What we’re seeing here is a clear trend that shows how important learning and development opportunities are to staff across the UK and how much career development is a non-negotiable when it comes to staying with an employee.

 “During a time when business survival depends on retaining the right number of staff with the correct skill sets but inflationary pressures are making it impossible to increase wages to keep up with the cost of living, organisations must look at other options to keep staff satisfaction – and headcounts – up.”

Byrne continued: “Rather than cutting L&D budgets and risk a staff exodus, business leaders must consider the clear return on investment that upskilling and training programmes can provide. Whether it’s attracting the best new staff, improving the skills of managers, upgrading workplace culture by encouraging continuous learning or developing each individual to reach their career goals within your organisation, L&D has a tangible impact on retention rates and therefore, your business’ bottom line, at a time when success is most needed.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Peter Dando: Why ‘salary sacrifice’ needs renaming

Salary sacrifice schemes are designed to help employees make smarter financial choices - but they remain widely misunderstood.

HR hiring rises as firms respond to compliance pressure and employment law changes

HR and accounting roles see strong pay and hiring growth as businesses prepare for new employment law requirements and greater regulatory complexity.

Biscuit break or energy crash? Junk food blamed for workplace energy slumps

Poor eating habits are leaving staff tired and distracted during the working day, with many reporting dips in concentration, cravings and reduced performance.

Peter Lynch on why HR should lead technology

“Why is HR the right group to lead technology? Because we have the right mindset.”
- Advertisement -

Co-op chief executive steps down after ‘toxic culture’ claims

Senior staff concerns over fear and silence at major UK retailer coincide with a leadership exit after a turbulent year.

Lauren Webb: Leadership lessons – we rise by lifting (or training) others

The way organisations prepare new managers decides whether they grow into talent multipliers, or retreat towards helicopter parenting.

Must read

Catherine Trombley: A rose by any other name

If you are an HR manager and also happen...

Neil Buck: Building effective AI policies in the workplace

AI offers organisations the chance to work more intelligently rather than simply faster - but these opportunities sit alongside genuine challenges.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you