HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Many women feel female health issues are ignored by employers

-

Nine in ten women think there should be policies in workplaces to support women when it comes to female health issues, according to research by BetterUp.

The research also found that three in five women (59%) have taken time off work due to female health issues such as menopause, fertility struggles, periods and pregnancy (not including maternity leave).

Of the 59 percent who have taken time off due to female health issues, over a quarter (26%) cited periods as the issue.

Also, 14 percent said it was because of menopause, and almost one in five (19%) took additional time off due to pregnancy.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

Equality Act 2010

This research comes as the UK government decided to not introduce menopause as a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010.

Of those who have taken time off, over half (54%) said that they were open to their employer as to why they needed time off, and that their employer was understanding.

However, a quarter said they did not feel comfortable telling their employer why they needed time off, highlighting the need for companies to create safe environments where everyone can be open and honest as to what is going on in their life.

 

What policies are currently in place?

Over half of those surveyed (51%) said their companies do not have policies in place to support women going through menopause, and among those who say their company has some support in place, 23 percent say the support is inadequate.

Only 5 percent of women say their workplace has been accommodating and has provided support such as a cooling fan or a workspace with more airflow.

 

What do job seekers look for?

A staggering 86 percent of respondents said they would be more likely to work at a company if they had support in place for female health issues, demonstrating the business case for implementing programs that support women, especially in light of The Great Resignation and businesses fighting to retain talent

Of those who said they would prefer to work for a company that had support in place for female health issues, over a third (37%) said it would make them think the company had a great culture.

 

Dr. Erin Eatough, Manager of Behavioural Science at BetterUp says: “It’s clear that there’s a business case for providing more programs that support the needs of women in the workplace. Supporting our people as they navigate health needs is not only the right thing to do from a human perspective, but it’s also clearly something organisations can do to attract and retain critical talent.”

“By investing in programs that support women, organisations are in a better place to prevent senior and experienced women from leaving, and more likely to attract and retain younger talent.

“Many women feel like female health issues can be ignored or not taken seriously by employers, so creating an environment where women feel safe to be open about what is affecting them is going to be key for employers moving forward.”

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Peter Dando: Why ‘salary sacrifice’ needs renaming

Salary sacrifice schemes are designed to help employees make smarter financial choices - but they remain widely misunderstood.

HR hiring rises as firms respond to compliance pressure and employment law changes

HR and accounting roles see strong pay and hiring growth as businesses prepare for new employment law requirements and greater regulatory complexity.

Biscuit break or energy crash? Junk food blamed for workplace energy slumps

Poor eating habits are leaving staff tired and distracted during the working day, with many reporting dips in concentration, cravings and reduced performance.

Peter Lynch on why HR should lead technology

“Why is HR the right group to lead technology? Because we have the right mindset.”
- Advertisement -

Co-op chief executive steps down after ‘toxic culture’ claims

Senior staff concerns over fear and silence at major UK retailer coincide with a leadership exit after a turbulent year.

Lauren Webb: Leadership lessons – we rise by lifting (or training) others

The way organisations prepare new managers decides whether they grow into talent multipliers, or retreat towards helicopter parenting.

Must read

Ryan Bonnici: Why I’m introducing one video call free day a week at a video call company

"Pausing meetings for one day will improve engagement levels in meetings in the rest of the week - as employees will have time to actually do their work - and also ensure everyone’s schedules are aligned."

Clare Parkinson: Can we scrap our employee bonus scheme?

What can you do if your organisation can no longer afford an employee bonus scheme?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you