Higher-earning women more likely to reduce paid work after childbirth than male partners

-

Research shows that mothers who have a higher salary within the household pre-childbirth are still more frequently leaving the workplace after having a child, in comparison to their male partners.

A new analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) shows that women who earn more than their male partner are still more likely to leave their paid employment or cut their hours after childbirth.

According to research cited, gender pay gaps are usually driven by pre-existing gaps in earnings within opposite-gender couples – since men already earn more than women, on average, even before they have children – which then drives decisions around who reduces paid work once children are born.

However, this new research shows that mothers are still more likely to reduce paid work in some form even when she has the higher rate of pay which is the case for almost two-fifths of heterosexual couples (38 per cent).

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In this scenario, mothers who earn a higher salary are four times more likely (13 per cent) than their male partner (3 per cent) to leave the workforce after having children.

In addition, when women do choose to stay in the workforce after giving birth, their working hours fall by over a quarter (26 per cent). The research finds that there is little to no reduction in the number of paid hours that men work after having a child – including when they earn less than their female partner.

The report ultimately highlights that childbirth greatly impacts the evolution of gender differences in careers over the life cycle. Women’s employment rates jump sharply down from about 90 per cent to 75 per cent, and average weekly hours of work for those still in paid work fall from around 40 to less than 30.

In cases where women earn less than their male partners prior to giving birth, mothers’ employment rates for paid work falls by 22 per cent whilst the hours of paid work falls by a third (33 per cent).

Alison Andrew, a Senior Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said:

The gendered roles of men and women in paid work and childcare after heterosexual couples start families play a crucial part in the development of the gender pay gap, and gender differences in careers more generally.

How these parents divide up paid work and childcare cannot be straightforwardly explained by (smaller) pre-existing differences in their career trajectories. Even where the mother was the main earner before having a child, she is much more likely to give up work or reduce her hours after becoming a parent than is the father.

So the roots of these gender differences cannot all be traced back to which parent was in the better position, career-wise, to be the primary breadwinner. Attempts to understand and address gender pay gaps must consider the role of social norms and maternity and paternity policies – and the links between the two – in driving men’s and women’s roles after childbirth.


*This research was obtained from an IFS report entitled “The Careers and Time Use of Mothers and Fathers” which analyses why the number of women in paid employment falls after giving birth.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Teresa Budworth:Help make the pain go away

If you've ever suffered from back pain, and 4...

Nick Campbell: The Menopause and menstrual health & tackling taboo

"The topic of menopause remains a taboo in the workplace – and this needs to be addressed if we want to enact a meaningful response to the issue."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you