HRreview Header

Public sector redundancy payment cap scrapped by Government

-

The Government has decided to revoke a cap on public sector redundancy payments which was implemented at the end of last year. 

A cap which limited public sector redundancy payments to £95,000 has now been revoked after unions took legal action against the Government.

This cap, intended to prevent excessive pay-outs for high earners, was harshly criticised by unions who stated that this cap would impact long-serving local Government staff the most. This is due to the fact that the cap includes the contributions which employers make to pension costs.

Christina McAnea, Unison’s general secretary, said:

It’s great the government has finally seen sense and stepped back from this damaging regulation that threatened to blight the retirement of millions of workers.

Through no fault of their own, long-serving staff over the age of 55 and facing redundancy would have been hit by the regulation. Because they’re obliged to take their pensions if they lose their jobs, when combined with redundancy payments the final amount could have exceeded the £95,000 cap.

The government has wasted much time and money and should now abandon any plans to reintroduce the regulations. Instead, ministers should concentrate on supporting dedicated public service workers who are delivering for their communities in the most challenging of circumstances.

As such, the Treasury has since published guidelines which encourages employers to pay employees who were made redundant and left between 4 November and 12 February the amount they would have gotten if the cap was not instated.

However, others such as John O’Connell, the Chief Executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, disagreed with the decision to repeal the cap. He stated the necessity of replacing the cap with a different limiting measure or otherwise risking “private sector workers who have faced a year of unprecedented hardship” being “once again … forced to foot the bill for golden goodbyes”.

A spokesperson for the Treasury said:

Following an extensive review, we have withdrawn the cap on exit payments due to the unintended consequences it had on employees. We remain committed to bringing forward proposals at pace to tackle unjustified exit payments.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Managers’ biggest fears? ‘Confrontation and redundancies’

Survey of UK managers reveals fear of confrontation and redundancies, with many lacking training to handle difficult workplace situations.
- Advertisement -

Mike Bond: Redefining talent – and prioritising the creative mindset

Not too long ago, the most prized CVs boasted MBAs, consulting pedigrees and an impressive record of traditional experience. Now, things are different.

UK loses ground in global remote work rankings

Connectivity gaps across the UK risk weakening the country’s appeal to remote workers and internationally mobile talent.

Must read

What can a company do if their employee is caught up in a potential scandal?

Damaging the reputation of a business can be considered gross misconduct and  it is important to act appropriately should you receive reports or evidence that one of your employees could have done so.

Jo Causon: First impressions are everything, particularly when you’re a nation of customer service providers

You don’t get a second chance to make a good first impression, says the old adage. It’s a well-known maxim, but familiarity does not mean organisations can afford to dismiss the underlying sentiment. In the context of customer service, without creating a good impression at the outset, the businesses that make up UK plc risk damage to their reputation and market share.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you