Advice given how to keep employees safe from coronavirus

-

coronavirus

As the coronavirus has spread to 10 countries and has led to over 900 deaths a company that offers HR intelligence for employers has offered advice on how business’ should support their staff during the spread of this virus.

XpertHR has answered some pivotal questions:

If an employee has symptoms associated with the coronavirus, can they be instructed not to come to work?

“Employers are under a duty to ensure the health and safety of all their employees and to provide a safe place and system of work. These duties exist under both common law and statute. Employees are also under a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that they do not endanger themselves or anyone who may be affected by their actions or omissions at work.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“In light of these duties, and the serious implications for their business if the coronavirus is contracted and spread in the workplace, employers would be justified in instructing any employee with the symptoms associated with the coronavirus not to attend work, and to seek a diagnosis from a medical professional and not return to work until the symptoms have cleared.”

Is there any duty on employers to close their workplace to prevent the spread of viruses such as the coronavirus?

“There is generally no requirement for employers to close their workplace during a flu pandemic or an infectious disease outbreak, but employers should check guidance from the Department of Health or the relevant public health body on a regular basis.”

Can an employer insist that an employee who has flu-like symptoms is tested for the coronavirus?

“Employers cannot insist that their employees are tested for flu. Testing an employee without their agreement would constitute a criminal assault and could also result in a claim for constructive unfair dismissal. In order for an employer to require an employee to submit to a test for flu, it would need a contractual right to do so. Even then, the employee must be willing to be tested.”

Do employers have a duty to take special measures to protect those employees who are most at risk if they are exposed to the coronavirus?

“Employers should check guidance from the Department of Health or the relevant public health body on any health conditions that could make someone vulnerable to becoming seriously ill with the coronavirus. People at particular risk could include those with weakened immune systems, older workers, and those with long-term conditions like diabetes, cancer and chronic lung disease.

“Given the duty to ensure the health and safety of their employees, employers should consider measures to protect these employees from the risk of infection, for example by reassigning staff from high-risk work sites or locations. Employers are also under special duties in relation to pregnant employees and disabled workers.”

Jo Stubbs, head of product content strategy of XpertHR’s said:

With the spread of the coronavirus, it’s important for employers to consider what they can do to protect their business and workforce. For example, they should issue clear guidance to employees who have recently travelled to China or who have been in contact with someone who has.

If they haven’t already got one, employers should consider putting in place a flu pandemic contingency plan to address business continuity in case the situation worsens. They should also consider implementing an infectious diseases in the workplace policy to ensure a clear approach to minimising the risk of the coronavirus being contracted and spread.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Alan Price: Can employers restrict staff from taking foreign holiday?

"From an employer's perspective, the statutory duties under the Working Time Regulations always dictate their approach to annual leave."

Oliver Watson: Why diversity holds the key to your organisation’s ROI

It’s no secret that there is increasing pressure on businesses to employ a diverse workforce and with good reason. Over the past few years, while there have been steps in the right direction – for instance, FTSE 100 companies reaching more than 25% representation of women on boards – there is certainly more to be done across the board for diversity (and not just on gender parity).
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you